St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare

Name: St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare
Address: 220 ST MARY'S DRIVE, Cherry Hill, NJ, 08003, US
Telephone: 8568745300

220 St Mary'S Drive, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 · Camden County · 215 certified beds · avg 202 residents/day · certified since Feb 21, 1967

Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.19

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 6, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Dec 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 19, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Oct 19, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 19, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	20	F
2024	5	F
2025	2	E
2026	5	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	New Jersey avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.19	3.88	3.95	bottom 14% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.40	0.67	0.69	bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.79	3.53	3.50	bottom 9% in New Jersey; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.21	0.50	0.48	bottom 12% in New Jersey; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	54.4	39.7	45.8	bottom 14% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	30.0	37.7	42.9	top 34% in New Jersey; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.41, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Cherry Hill Ventures LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	12/01/2015
Babroff, Sherri	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/15/2015
Babroff, Sherri	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/15/2015
Babroff, Sherri	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/15/2015
Boehm, Caroline	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2015
Cherry Hill Ventures LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2015
Gros, Charles-Edouard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2015
Hein, Patricia	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/18/2023
Hein, Patricia	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/18/2023
Klein, Baruch	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2015
Klein, Baruch	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2015
Levi, Shlomo	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2022
Levi, Shlomo	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2022
Levi, Shlomo	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2022
Newport Real Estate Capital LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/19/2019
Papastamelos, Athanasios	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2016
Papastamelos, Athanasios	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2016
Vinitsky, Avrohom	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2022
Vinitsky, Avrohom	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2022
Vinitsky, Avrohom	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Careone at Evesham	1.4 mi	Marlton, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC	1.6 mi	Voorhees, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC	1.9 mi	Voorhees, NJ	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	2.4 mi	Cherry Hill, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Echelon Care & Rehab	2.5 mi	Voorhees, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Voorhees Pediatric Facility	2.5 mi	Voorhees, NJ	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare	2.6 mi	Voorhees, NJ	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Lions Gate	2.7 mi	Voorhees, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Silver Healthcare Center	2.8 mi	Cherry Hill, NJ	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Wiley Mission	2.9 mi	Marlton, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees	3.0 mi	Voorhees, NJ	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	3.2 mi	Mount Laurel, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cherry Hill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315060.

The Care File

Visit checklist — St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare

220 St Mary'S Drive, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 · 8568745300

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 315060 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)