How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care
110 Beaver Dam Road, Brookhaven, NY 11719 (opens Google Maps) · Suffolk County · (631) 286-8100· 240 certified beds · avg 235 residents/day · certified since Nov 15, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 21, 2024
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Sep 5, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Sep 5, 2025 · F-0700 · triggered by a complaint
The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Sep 5, 2025 · F-0700 · triggered by a complaint
The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Why it matters: Improperly used bed rails can trap or injure residents — in the worst cases, causing serious harm.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 28, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 28, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 25, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint F-0700
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint F-0835
The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint F-0865
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint · F-0700 |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint · F-0865 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Jul 28, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jul 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jul 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jun 21, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jun 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jun 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jun 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 1 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.58
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.35
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.24
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.58 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 5% in New York; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 8% in New York; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.24 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 4% in New York; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 9% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.0 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 49% in New York; top 31% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.1 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 15% in New York; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.23, RN 0.44, weekend 2.80.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.23 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Einhorn, Sharon | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 03/01/2010 |
| Friedman, Devorah | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 14% | 03/01/2010 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2010 |
| Minzer, Israel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 03/01/2010 |
| Schlesinger, Ernest | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 03/01/2010 |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/30/2019 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2010 |
| Hogan, Suzanne | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2021 |
| Hogan, Suzanne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2021 |
| Hogan, Suzanne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2021 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2010 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2010 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Schlesinger, Ernest | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2010 |
| Sethi, Dinesh | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Sethi, Dinesh | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Sethi, Dinesh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Vinitsky, Avrohom | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Center Management Group — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care — New Rochelle, NY · overall 3/5
- Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care — Smithtown, NY · overall 2/5
- Westhampton Care Center — Westhampton, NY · overall 5/5
- Immaculatemarycenter for Rehabilitation&healthcare — Philadelphia, PA · overall 1/5
- St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Darby, PA · overall 1/5
- St Martha Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Downingtown, PA · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "How does your quality improvement program work, and can you share a recent example of a problem you found and fixed?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
- "Who provides social services here, and how would they support my family member's emotional and social needs?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 30 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brookhaven Health Care Facility, LLC | 2.1 mi | East Patchogue, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Swan Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.2 mi | Patchogue, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Medford Multicare Center for Living | 4.6 mi | Medford, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Island Nursing and Rehab Center | 6.0 mi | Holtsville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sayville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.9 mi | Sayville, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Nursing and Rehabilitation Care Ctr | 8.3 mi | Sayville, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Quantum Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC | 8.4 mi | Middle Island, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Surge Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC | 8.4 mi | Middle Island, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oasis Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC | 8.6 mi | Center Moriches, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Affinity Skilled Living and Rehabilitation Center | 9.5 mi | Oakdale, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Allegria Nursing & Rehab Center of Port Jefferson | 11.1 mi | Port Jefferson Stati, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jefferson's Ferry | 11.6 mi | South Setauket, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Suffolk, NY — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Berkshire Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — West Babylon, NY · overall 5/5
- Brookside Multicare Nursing Center — Smithtown, NY · overall 5/5
- Carillon Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Huntington, NY · overall 4/5
- East Neck Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — West Babylon, NY · overall 3/5
- Gurwin Jewish Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Commack, NY · overall 5/5
- Huntington Hills Center for Health and Rehabilitat — Melville, NY · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335755.