How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
155 Dean Street, Brooklyn, NY 11217 (opens Google Maps) · Kings County · (718) 694-6700· 288 certified beds · avg 287 residents/day · certified since Feb 16, 2005 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 12, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.84
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. F-0851
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Mar 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.84
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.48
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.62
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.84 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 16% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 31% in New York; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.62 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 24% in New York; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 40% in New York; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.0 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 17% in New York; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.6 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 11% in New York; top 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.24, RN 0.55, weekend 2.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.24 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fuchs, Bernard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2011 |
| Fuchs, Gerald | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2011 |
| Hopkins Ventures LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/24/2011 |
| Lieber, Eli | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 03/24/2011 |
| Rubin, Baila | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/01/2018 |
| Rubin, Dorothy | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/01/2018 |
| Rubin, Marvin | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/01/2018 |
| Traube, Esther | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 03/24/2011 |
| Ali, Aleem | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/19/2024 |
| Ali, Aleem | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/19/2024 |
| Donowitz, Aryeh | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2020 |
| Donowitz, Aryeh | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2020 |
| Donowitz, Aryeh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2020 |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/29/2020 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2011 |
| Hopkins Ventures LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2011 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2020 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Lieber, Eli | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2011 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Center Management Group — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care — Smithtown, NY · overall 2/5
- Westhampton Care Center — Westhampton, NY · overall 5/5
- Immaculatemarycenter for Rehabilitation&healthcare — Philadelphia, PA · overall 1/5
- St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Darby, PA · overall 1/5
- St Martha Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Downingtown, PA · overall 5/5
- St Mary Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Lansdale, PA · overall 4/5
- Villa at Stamford, the — Stamford, CT · overall 4/5
- Bishop McCarthy Center for Rehab & Healthcare — Vineland, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "How do you communicate important notices to residents who speak another language or have trouble seeing or hearing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 26% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 287 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobble Hill Health Center INC | 0.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 0.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oxford Nursing Home | 0.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New Carlton Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC | 0.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bedford Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| New Gouverneur Hospital SNF | 1.8 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New East Side Nursing Home | 2.1 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Concord Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Caton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, LLC | 2.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio | 2.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing | 2.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Kings, NY — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Linden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Menorah Home & Hospital for Aged & Infirm — Brooklyn, NY · overall 2/5
- Norwegian Christian Home and Health Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Palm Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 2/5
- Rutland Nursing Home, INC — Brooklyn, NY · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335847.