1304 Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043 (opens Google Maps) · Camden County · (856) 346-3300· 122 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: MILLENNIUM HEALTH SYSTEMS (4 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 21, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. F-0725
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Oct 21, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 23, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| May 23, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 23, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Sep 30, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Sep 30, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 30, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Sep 30, 2021 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $33,579.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2025 | Fine | $33,579 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.21 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 15% in New Jersey; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.08 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 11% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.89 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 16% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.76 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 2% in New Jersey; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.7 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 15% in New Jersey; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 25% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.36, RN 2.14, weekend 5.72.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.36 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Voorhees Pediatric Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Lipschutz Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 12/16/2012 |
| Barry M Kantrowitz Revocable Trust Dated 12/17/2009 | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2010 |
| Millennium Consolidated, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 11/15/2019 |
| Nonmarital Trust Under the Howard Lipschutz Revocable Trust 5/21/15 | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 06/01/2021 |
| Weisman Family Holdings LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 46% | 08/31/2005 |
| 2012 Lipschutz Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2012 |
| Antonio, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Antonio, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Barry M Kantrowitz Revocable Trust Dated 12/17/2009 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Kovalchik, Lauren | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2025 |
| Kovalchik, Lauren | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2025 |
| Millennium Consolidated, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/15/2019 |
| NJ Health Systems, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/04/2013 |
| Nonmarital Trust Under the Howard Lipschutz Revocable Trust 5/21/15 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Pizzichillo, Gary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2020 |
| Pizzichillo, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2025 |
| Weisman Family Holdings LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/31/2005 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Millennium Health Systems — 4 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Echelon Care & Rehab | 0.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lions Gate | 0.3 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare | 0.5 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees | 0.7 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC | 1.9 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 2.5 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC | 2.5 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 2.8 mi | Stratford, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Careone at Evesham | 3.5 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Silver Healthcare Center | 4.0 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Wiley Mission | 4.1 mi | Marlton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4.5 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Camden, NJ — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315289.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details