New JerseyVoorhees

Echelon Care & Rehab

1302 Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043 · Camden County · 240 certified beds · avg 225 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1981

Part of chain: PARAMOUNT CARE CENTERS (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.50
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jun 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jun 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Aug 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 31, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 31, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 31, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 31, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250F
2023130F
202410D
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.503.883.95bottom 40% in New Jersey; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.280.670.69bottom 4% in New Jersey; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.243.533.50bottom 46% in New Jersey; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.500.48bottom 8% in New Jersey; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.939.745.8bottom 45% in New Jersey; top 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.937.742.9bottom 44% in New Jersey; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.39, RN 0.27, weekend 3.14. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
The Pines at Voorhees Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/10/2022
Davis, BrianIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2022
First American Capital Group CorporationOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2022
Paramount Care Centers LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Voorhees Pediatric Facility0.0 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Lions Gate0.3 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare0.5 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees0.7 miVoorhees, NJ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC1.9 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare2.5 miCherry Hill, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC2.5 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center2.8 miStratford, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Careone at Evesham3.5 miMarlton, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Silver Healthcare Center4.0 miCherry Hill, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Wiley Mission4.1 miMarlton, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.5 miCherry Hill, NJ★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Voorhees →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315187.