New JerseyVoorhees

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees

1086 Dumont Circle, Voorhees, NJ 08043 · Camden County · 120 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Feb 13, 2007

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE (59 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$84,835
Fines, last 3 years
3.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 23, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint
Sep 23, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 26, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Sep 17, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 17, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Sep 17, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Sep 17, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 17, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150F
2024160F
202531J ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $84,835.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 23, 2025Fine$84,835

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.803.883.95top 41% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.280.670.69bottom 4% in New Jersey; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.663.533.50top 30% in New Jersey; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.500.48bottom 2% in New Jersey; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.739.745.8top 21% in New Jersey; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)55.637.742.9bottom 16% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.82, RN 0.28, weekend 3.68. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
1086 Dumont Circle Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2024
Schwartz, MarkIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Stern, AryehIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Iacona, JustinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Iacona, JustinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Pecora, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Schwartz, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Schwartz, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Stern, SamuelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Stern, SamuelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Stern, SamuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lions Gate0.4 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Echelon Care & Rehab0.7 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Voorhees Pediatric Facility0.7 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare1.0 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center2.1 miStratford, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC2.6 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare3.0 miCherry Hill, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC3.2 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Silver Healthcare Center4.0 miCherry Hill, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Careone at Evesham4.1 miMarlton, NJ★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Voorhees →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315500.