New JerseyMarlton

Wiley Mission

99 East Main Street, Marlton, NJ 08053 · Burlington County · 86 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Dec 5, 1997

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.79
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 27, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jul 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jul 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jul 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 23, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202120D
202380E
202490F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.793.883.95top 2% in New Jersey; top 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.430.670.69top 5% in New Jersey; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing6.083.533.50top 2% in New Jersey; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.750.500.48top 14% in New Jersey; top 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)25.739.745.8top 15% in New Jersey; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.037.742.9top 25% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.89, RN 1.24, weekend 5.28. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Farquhar, JayIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Farquhar, JayIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Flamini, VictorIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2006
Flamini, VictorIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2006
Flamini, VictorIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2006
Flamini, VictorIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2006
Flamini, VictorIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2006
Glimore, GaryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1986
Glimore, GaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1986
Glimore, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1986
Glimore, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1986
Glimore, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/1987
Glimore, JohnIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/1987
Hall, ThomasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Hall, ThomasIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Otte, CarolIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2006
Otte, CarolIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2006

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Voorhees, LLC1.6 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Careone at Evesham1.7 miMarlton, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Complete Care at Kresson View, LLC2.1 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare2.9 miCherry Hill, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
The Subacute at Autumn Lake Healthcare3.9 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Echelon Care & Rehab4.1 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Voorhees Pediatric Facility4.1 miVoorhees, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Lions Gate4.4 miVoorhees, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.5 miMount Laurel, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.6 miCherry Hill, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees4.8 miVoorhees, NJ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Medford Leas5.4 miMedford, NJ★★★★★3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marlton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315418.