4202 North 20th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85015 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (602) 264-3824· 114 certified beds · avg 107 residents/day · certified since Jun 24, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 11, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| Jan 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jan 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Aug 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Aug 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,278.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.38 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in Arizona; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.69 | bottom 40% in Arizona; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.98 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 29% in Arizona; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 29% in Arizona; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.4 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 24% in Arizona; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 41.7 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 44% in Arizona; top 50% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.23, RN 0.53, weekend 2.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.23 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Haven of Phoenix. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seastrand, Jason | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| West, Christian | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Ahmed, Bahaledin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Ahmed, Bahaledin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Gandhi, Hemang | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Gandhi, Hemang | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Greiner, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2023 |
| Greiner, Russell | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2023 |
| Haven Health Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Haven Health Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2024 |
| Haven Phoenix Real Estate LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Haven Phoenix Real Estate LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2024 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2024 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2024 |
| Koker, Shelly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2026 |
| Koker, Shelly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2026 |
| Robertson, Brett | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
| Samuelian, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Haven Health — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Rehabilitation Center at the Palazzo | 2.2 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beatitudes Campus | 2.9 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Camelback Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maryland Gardens Post Acute | 2.9 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Desert Terrace Healthcare Center | 4.3 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| The Terraces of Phoenix | 4.5 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC | 4.7 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bella Vita Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.7 mi | Glendale, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Desert Haven Care Center | 4.7 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| North Mountain Medical and Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Horizon Post Acute and Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | Glendale, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Coronado Healthcare Center | 6.4 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035107.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details