How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Haven of Saguaro Valley
6651 East Carondelet Drive, Tucson, AZ 85710 (opens Google Maps) · Pima County · (520) 731-8500· 112 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Feb 24, 1983 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 23, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Mar 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Apr 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Apr 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Apr 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.86
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.40
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.49
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.86 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 5% in Arizona; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.69 | bottom 13% in Arizona; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.49 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 4% in Arizona; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 20% in Arizona; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.8 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 27% in Arizona; top 33% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 1% in Arizona; top 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.85, RN 0.39, weekend 2.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Haven of Saguaro Valley. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robertson, Brett | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Samuelian, Robert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Samuelian, Stephen | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Seastrand, Jason | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| West, Christian | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Evans, Cole | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2025 |
| Evans, Cole | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Haven Health Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Haven Health Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2024 |
| Haven Saguaro Valley Real Estate LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Haven Saguaro Valley Real Estate LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2024 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2024 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2024 |
| Muir, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Muir, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Haven Health — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Haven of Sandpointe, LLC — Yuma, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Haven of Scottsdale — Scottsdale, AZ · overall 2/5
- Haven of Sedona — Sedona, AZ · overall 2/5abuseSFF
- Haven of Show Low — Show Low, AZ · overall 2/5
- Haven of Sierra Vista, LLC — Sierra Vista, AZ · overall 2/5abuse
- Haven of Tucson — Tucson, AZ · overall 2/5
- Haven of Yuma — Yuma, AZ · overall 3/5
- Haven Health Green Valley, LLC — Green Valley, AZ · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Arizona midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 36 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 21 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pueblo Springs Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sandstone Estates Rehab Centre | 1.7 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center | 1.7 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Devon Gables Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Handmaker Home for the Aging | 2.3 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Foothills Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Santa Rosa Care Center | 2.6 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| The Center at Tucson | 3.2 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 3.4 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Haven of Tucson | 4.0 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sandstone of Tucson Rehab Centre | 5.9 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 6.2 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Pima, AZ — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- La Canada Care Center — Tucson, AZ · overall 2/5
- Life Care Center of Tucson — Tucson, AZ · overall 1/5
- Mountain View Care Center — Tucson, AZ · overall 4/5
- Park Avenue Health and Rehabilitation Center — Tucson, AZ · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035085.