ArizonaTucson

Haven of Saguaro Valley

6651 East Carondelet Drive, Tucson, AZ 85710 · Pima County · 112 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Feb 24, 1983

Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Mar 25, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202290E
202370E
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.863.973.95bottom 5% in Arizona; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.690.69bottom 13% in Arizona; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.493.503.50bottom 4% in Arizona; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.290.490.48bottom 20% in Arizona; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.845.245.8top 27% in Arizona; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.043.642.9top 1% in Arizona; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.85, RN 0.39, weekend 2.48. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Robertson, BrettIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Samuelian, RobertIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Samuelian, SpencerIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Samuelian, StephenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Seastrand, JasonIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
West, ChristianIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2024
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2024
Evans, ColeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/10/2025
Evans, ColeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/10/2025
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Haven Health Properties LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Haven Health Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2024
Haven Saguaro Valley Real Estate LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Haven Saguaro Valley Real Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2024
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/21/2024
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/21/2024
Muir, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Muir, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pueblo Springs Rehabilitation Center1.6 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆3/5
Sandstone Estates Rehab Centre1.7 miTucson, AZ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center1.7 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Devon Gables Rehabilitation Center1.8 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Handmaker Home for the Aging2.3 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Foothills Rehabilitation Center2.4 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
Santa Rosa Care Center2.6 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
The Center at Tucson3.2 miTucson, AZ★★★★★5/5
Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation3.4 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Haven of Tucson4.0 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆2/5
Sandstone of Tucson Rehab Centre5.9 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation6.2 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tucson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035085.