How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2222 South Avenue A, Yuma, AZ 85364 (opens Google Maps) · Yuma County · (928) 783-8831· 143 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since Feb 19, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. F-0567
The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. F-0568
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · F-0602 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Sep 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Aug 4, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 4, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Aug 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Aug 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.60 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in Arizona; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.69 | bottom 48% in Arizona; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.16 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 42% in Arizona; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 29% in Arizona; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.7 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 4% in Arizona; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 8.3 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 2% in Arizona; top 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.60, weekend 3.26.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.72 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Haven of Sandpointe, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haven Health Group LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Robertson, Brett | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Samuelian, Robert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Samuelian, Stephen | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Seastrand, Jason | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| West, Christian | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| El Amin, Mohemed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| El Amin, Mohemed | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Haven Arizona Real Estate, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Haven Arizona Real Estate, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2024 |
| Haven Real Estate Partners, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Haven Real Estate Partners, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Haven Sandpointe Real Estate LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Haven Sandpointe Real Estate LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2024 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2024 |
Showing 20 of 39 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 19 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Haven Health — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welbrook Yuma Opco LLC | 0.6 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Yuma | 0.7 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Haven of Yuma | 0.7 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Yuma Nursing Center | 0.7 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Arizona State Veteran Home - Yuma | 6.6 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035096.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details