ArizonaPhoenix

Life Care Center of Paradise Valley

4065 East Bell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85032 · Maricopa County · 210 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Nov 2, 1987

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA (194 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.75
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024170E
202510E
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.753.973.95top 47% in Arizona; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.690.69top 45% in Arizona; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.213.503.50bottom 46% in Arizona; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.490.48top 44% in Arizona; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)25.345.245.8top 9% in Arizona; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.843.642.9top 22% in Arizona; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.61, weekend 3.21. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cross, CindyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/21/1994
Fletcher, ToddIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Fletcher, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/02/2020
Henry, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/16/1999
Lay, LisaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2017
Lay, LisaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/08/2018
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/1994
Preston, ForrestIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/06/1976
Preston, ForrestIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/06/1976
Swanker, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Swanker, RichardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2011
Thurmond, JoanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/21/2000
Wilkoff, RossIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/23/2021
Ziegler, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2001
Ziegler, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/16/1999

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ridgecrest Post Acute0.2 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★4/5
Phoenix Mountain Post Acute2.6 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Acacia Health Center3.0 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★5/5
Arizona State Veteran Home-Phx4.1 miPhoenix, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community5.0 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Commun6.3 miScottsdale, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
North Mountain Medical and Rehabilitation Center6.4 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★5/5
Christian Care Nursing Center6.6 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★☆4/5
Coronado Healthcare Center6.8 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★4/5
Sante of North Scottsdale6.9 miScottsdale, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
The Terraces of Phoenix7.1 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★4/5
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center7.8 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Phoenix →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035146.