ArizonaPeoria

Lake Pleasant Post Acute Rehabilitation Center

20625 North Lake Pleasant Road, Peoria, AZ 85382 · Maricopa County · 128 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jul 29, 1985

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care or assistance for a resident who uses a prosthesis, such as an artificial limb.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390E
202460E
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.393.973.95bottom 29% in Arizona; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.690.69top 46% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.973.503.50bottom 29% in Arizona; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.490.48top 42% in Arizona; top 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.045.245.8bottom 36% in Arizona; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)61.143.642.9bottom 17% in Arizona; bottom 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.32, RN 0.59, weekend 2.92. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Fischbeck, CourtneyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Hill, SeanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Hill, SeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Hill, SeanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Nagle, CraigIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2025
Nagle, CraigIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2025
Nagle, CraigIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2025
Peterson, ForrestIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2025
Sato, AmiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Sun Grove Village Care Center, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/23/1995

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sun City Post Acute1.3 miSun City, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Center at Arrowhead, LLC4.0 miGlendale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Freedom Plaza Care Center4.5 miPeoria, AZ★★★★★5/5
Boswell Transitional Care of Cascadia4.7 miSun City, AZ★★★★★4/5
Sun West Choice Healthcare & Rehab4.7 miSun City West, AZ★★★★★4/5
Peoria Post Acute and Rehabilitation4.7 miPeoria, AZ★★★★☆4/5
Advanced Health Care of Glendale5.1 miGlendale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Sunview Respiratory and Rehabilitation5.4 miYoungtown, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Sun Health Grandview Care Center5.8 miSun City West, AZ★★★★★5/5
Sante of Surprise5.8 miSurprise, AZ★★★★☆4/5
Surprise Health and Rehabilitation Center6.0 miSurprise, AZ★★★★★4/5
Immanuel Campus of Care6.8 miPeoria, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Peoria →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035111.