Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC

Name: Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC
Address: 1880 EAST VAN BUREN STREET, Phoenix, AZ, 85006, US
Telephone: 6022534570

1880 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ 85006 · Maricopa County · 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Feb 3, 2016

Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

2.71

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 13, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 12, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Aug 12, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 12, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
May 6, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
May 6, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 6, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 6, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 6, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Apr 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 10, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 15, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Dec 15, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 3).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	10	E
2024	17	E
2025	8	E
2026	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Arizona avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.71	3.97	3.95	bottom 2% in Arizona; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.28	0.69	0.69	bottom 5% in Arizona; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.51	3.50	3.50	bottom 5% in Arizona; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.32	0.49	0.48	bottom 27% in Arizona; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	41.1	45.2	45.8	top 30% in Arizona; top 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	45.0	43.6	42.9	bottom 48% in Arizona; bottom 44% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.31, RN 0.44, weekend 3.99. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Haven Health Properties LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	8%	08/01/2023
Health Group Management LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	8%	08/01/2023
Samuelian, Spencer	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2023
Seastrand, Jason	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2023
Brady, Mitchell	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/14/2025
Brady, Mitchell	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/14/2025
Espinosa, Stephanie	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/14/2024
Espinosa, Stephanie	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/14/2024
Espinosa, Stephanie	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/14/2024
Fragoso, Lindsay	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2023
Fragoso, Lindsay	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2023
Fragoso, Lindsay	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2023
Greiner, Russell	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/16/2023
Greiner, Russell	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/16/2023
Haven Health Properties LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/22/2025
Haven Sky Harbor Real Estate LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/22/2025
Health Group Management LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2023
Health Group Management LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/22/2025
Knight, Tashay	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/14/2025
Knight, Tashay	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/14/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Desert Terrace Healthcare Center	1.8 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Desert Haven Care Center	2.3 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Camelback Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation	3.7 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Resolve Harmony Center, LLC	4.1 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Haven of Phoenix	4.7 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
South Mountain Post Acute	5.6 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★★☆	4/5
Maryland Gardens Post Acute	5.8 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Mirabella at Asu	6.1 mi	Tempe, AZ	★★★☆☆	3/5
Desert Peak Care Center	6.2 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
The Rehabilitation Center at the Palazzo	6.3 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★★☆	3/5
Rehab at Scottsdale Village Square	6.6 mi	Scottsdale, AZ		—/5	abuseSFF
The Terraces of Phoenix	6.6 mi	Phoenix, AZ	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Phoenix →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035290.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC

1880 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ 85006 · 6022534570

Health inspection rating 1/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 035290 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)