ArizonaScottsdale

Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale

3339 North Drinkwater Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 · Maricopa County · 108 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1983

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250D
202340D
202410D
202580E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.573.973.95bottom 41% in Arizona; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.510.690.69bottom 32% in Arizona; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.133.503.50bottom 38% in Arizona; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.490.48bottom 14% in Arizona; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.745.245.8bottom 33% in Arizona; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)70.043.642.9bottom 9% in Arizona; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.47, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2015
Clark, RandolphIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2023
Clark, RandolphIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2023
Clark, RandolphIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2023
Dixon, ShaneIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2026
Dixon, ShaneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2026
Dixon, ShaneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2026
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Monks, ChandlerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Peterson, ForrestIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/05/2025
Sato, AmiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Scottsdale Heritage Court, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation0.1 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Haven of Scottsdale0.1 miScottsdale, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
Rehab at Scottsdale Village Square0.9 miScottsdale, AZ—/5abuseSFF
Plaza Healthcare1.9 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Mirabella at Asu4.6 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Desert Haven Care Center5.8 miPhoenix, AZ★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sandridge Post Acute5.8 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Desert Terrace Healthcare Center6.4 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Advance Health Care of Scottsdale6.6 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Friendship Village of Tempe6.9 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆4/5
Life Care Center of Scottsdale7.1 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center7.3 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Scottsdale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035083.