ArizonaScottsdale

Haven of Scottsdale

3293 North Drinkwater Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 · Maricopa County · 56 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Nov 16, 1978

Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 7, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Nov 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
2024100E
202510D
2026121G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.093.973.95bottom 11% in Arizona; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.690.69top 48% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.543.503.50bottom 6% in Arizona; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.490.48bottom 47% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)76.945.245.8bottom 1% in Arizona; bottom 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)75.043.642.9bottom 7% in Arizona; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.14, RN 0.61, weekend 2.58. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Haven Health Group LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2016
Seastrand, JasonIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2016
Dixon, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Dixon, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Haven Health Properties LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2016
Haven Health Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Haven Scottsdale Real Estate LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2016
Haven Scottsdale Real Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2024
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Longhurst, StockIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020
Longhurst, StockIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020
Muir, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/15/2015
Muir, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/15/2015
Murphy, NicoleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Murphy, NicoleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Robertson, BrettIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2016
Robertson, BrettIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation0.0 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale0.1 miScottsdale, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Rehab at Scottsdale Village Square0.8 miScottsdale, AZ—/5abuseSFF
Plaza Healthcare1.9 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Mirabella at Asu4.5 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Desert Haven Care Center5.8 miPhoenix, AZ★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sandridge Post Acute5.8 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Desert Terrace Healthcare Center6.4 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Advance Health Care of Scottsdale6.7 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Friendship Village of Tempe6.8 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆4/5
Life Care Center of Scottsdale7.2 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC7.3 miPhoenix, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Scottsdale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035059.