How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
7605 Line Avenue, Shreveport, LA 71106 (opens Google Maps) · Caddo County · (318) 219-2608· 80 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Oct 3, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. F-0636
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. F-0637
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jun 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jun 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jun 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · F-0624 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.23 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 14% in Louisiana; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.19 | 0.32 | 0.69 | bottom 26% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.95 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 25% in Louisiana; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 28% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.6 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in Louisiana; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 41.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.19, weekend 2.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.10 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| SDB Holdings | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Brownlee, Kourtney | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2025 |
| McFarland, Mairus | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2025 |
| McKinney, Ashley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2018 |
| Priority Management Group, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Priority Management Group, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2025 |
| Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 0.9 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pierremont Healthcare Center | 1.2 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Garden Park Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC | 1.7 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Village Health Care at the Glen | 3.0 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Magnolia Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC | 3.0 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Claiborne Healthcare Center | 3.0 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Stratmore Nursing & Rehab Ctr | 3.2 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Live Oak | 3.3 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.4 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Shreveport Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation | 3.4 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southern Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 3.6 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Bradford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.6 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Caddo, LA — 22 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195615.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details