LouisianaDonaldsonville

Chateau D'ville Rehab and Retirement

401 Vatican Drive, Donaldsonville, LA 70346 · Ascension County · 141 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Jul 3, 2000

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$15,307
Fines, last 3 years
3.07
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Feb 29, 2024 · F-0812

The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Why it matters: Unsafe food handling is one of the most common causes of food poisoning, which can be dangerous for frail residents.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Mar 21, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 12, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 12, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Feb 29, 2024▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360E
202461L ▲
202550E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $15,307.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 29, 2024Fine$15,307

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.074.043.95bottom 10% in Louisiana; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.290.320.69top 43% in Louisiana; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.533.453.50bottom 8% in Louisiana; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.200.48top 17% in Louisiana; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)21.747.645.8top 3% in Louisiana; top 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.041.642.9top 17% in Louisiana; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 0.32, weekend 2.76. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boulware D'ville LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%01/01/2023
Boulware, ThomasIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest13%01/01/2023
Centermark ManagementOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%01/01/2023
CKF Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%01/01/2023
Lord, GregoryIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%01/01/2023
Rogenmoser D'ville LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%01/01/2023
Rogenmoser, RobertIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%01/01/2023
Walker, KatieIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest13%01/01/2023
Wimberly, JonathanIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%01/01/2023
Wright, ChristopherIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%01/01/2023
Almond, DustinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/21/2025
Boulware D'ville LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware D'ville LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware, DouglasIndividual5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware, DouglasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware, SandraIndividual5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware, SandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware, StevenIndividual5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware, StevenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Boulware, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chateau Napoleon Caring, LLC9.6 miNapoleonville, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Gonzales Healthcare Center10.3 miGonzales, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ascension Oaks Nursing & Rehab Center10.3 miGonzales, LA★★★★☆4/5
Landmark South Nursing & Rehabilitation Center18.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★☆4/5
Chateau St. James Rehab and Retirement18.6 miLutcher, LA★★★☆☆4/5
Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Plaquemine18.8 miPlaquemine, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Landmark of Plaquemine18.9 miPlaquemine, LA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Donaldsonville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195491.