LouisianaShreveport

Southern Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation

9105 Baird Road, Shreveport, LA 71118 · Caddo County · 101 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Mar 22, 2001

Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$61,584
Fines, last 3 years
4.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 1, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Mar 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0609

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Mar 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0835

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Mar 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
May 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 7, 2025▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Feb 7, 2025▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 7, 2025▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Feb 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Feb 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Feb 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202420D
2025134L ▲
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $61,584.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 14, 2025Fine$17,345
Feb 7, 2025Fine$44,239

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.624.043.95top 19% in Louisiana; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.320.69top 34% in Louisiana; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.223.453.50top 12% in Louisiana; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.200.48bottom 47% in Louisiana; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.147.645.8bottom 50% in Louisiana; bottom 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.041.642.9top 45% in Louisiana; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.26, weekend 3.46. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Medico LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2014
Account Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Account Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Aria Care Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Beebe, BobbyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Beebe, BobbyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Beebe, EltonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Beebe, EltonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Beebe, NancyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Hernandez, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Hernandez, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Landmark of Shreveport LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Lena Heritage LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Medico LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Ott, VickiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2024
Ott, VickiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2024
Parkinson, ToniIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2015
Parkinson, ToniIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Bradford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation0.1 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Guest House Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation0.7 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Heritage Manor South2.0 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5
Garden Park Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC2.0 miShreveport, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation3.5 miShreveport, LA★★★★★4/5
Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit3.6 miShreveport, LA★★☆☆☆4/5
Village Health Care at the Glen4.2 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Heritage Manor West4.4 miShreveport, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
Pierremont Healthcare Center4.5 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Live Oak5.1 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Shreveport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195519.