LouisianaShreveport

The Bradford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

3050 Baird Road, Shreveport, LA 71118 · Caddo County · 146 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Jan 12, 2001

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jul 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Aug 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jul 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jul 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110E
2024100E
202570E
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.284.043.95bottom 16% in Louisiana; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.200.320.69bottom 27% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.923.453.50bottom 22% in Louisiana; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.200.48top 38% in Louisiana; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.347.645.8bottom 44% in Louisiana; bottom 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.20, weekend 2.89. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boulware, DouglasIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
SDB HoldingsOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2019
Boulware, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Colvin, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Grimm, TamaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2018
Peterson, StephenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
Priority Management Group, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Priority Management Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Southern Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation0.1 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Guest House Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation0.7 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Heritage Manor South1.9 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5
Garden Park Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC2.0 miShreveport, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation3.5 miShreveport, LA★★★★★4/5
Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit3.6 miShreveport, LA★★☆☆☆4/5
Village Health Care at the Glen4.2 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Heritage Manor West4.5 miShreveport, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
Pierremont Healthcare Center4.6 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Live Oak5.0 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Shreveport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195513.