4921 Medical Drive, Bossier City, LA 71112 (opens Google Maps) · Bossier County · (318) 742-5420· 120 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Sep 24, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)SFF Candidate
What the abuse flag means → · What Special Focus status means →
Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 5, 2025 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 5, 2025 · F-0697
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 5, 2025 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. F-0600
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. F-0697
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. F-0835
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jun 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 24, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 12).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 12 | 3 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $66,170.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2025 | Fine | $66,170 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.99 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Louisiana; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.69 | bottom 3% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.69 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in Louisiana; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in Louisiana; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 72.5 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 3% in Louisiana; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 41.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.23, RN 0.11, weekend 2.91.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.23 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bauder, William | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| SDB Holdings | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Colvin, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/27/2025 |
| Copeland, Jamie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2025 |
| Lewis, Rukiya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2018 |
| Priority Management Group, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Priority Management Group, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2025 |
| Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverview Care Center | 0.1 mi | Bossier City, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cornerstone Post Acute Care of Bossier | 0.1 mi | Bossier City, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Northwest Louisiana Veterans Home | 2.4 mi | Bossier City, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Stratmore Nursing & Rehab Ctr | 3.7 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pierremont Healthcare Center | 4.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Live Oak | 4.8 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit | 4.9 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.9 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Highland Place Rehab and Nursing Center | 5.0 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Magnolia Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC | 5.4 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Village Health Care at the Glen | 5.4 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Claiborne Healthcare Center | 5.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Bossier, LA — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195604.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details