LouisianaShreveport

Village Health Care at the Glen

403 E. Flournoy Lucas, Shreveport, LA 71115 · Caddo County · 126 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Oct 8, 2001

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$12,735
Fines, last 3 years
4.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 16, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 22, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Mar 16, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
May 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202480E
202590E
202661G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,735.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 16, 2026Fine$12,735

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.714.043.95top 17% in Louisiana; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.260.320.69bottom 49% in Louisiana; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.453.453.50top 8% in Louisiana; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.150.200.48top 50% in Louisiana; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.647.645.8top 14% in Louisiana; top 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.941.642.9bottom 47% in Louisiana; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.19, RN 0.23, weekend 3.97. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
The Glen Retirement SystemOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1966
Bolton, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Bolton, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Burns, DeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Burns, DeeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Burns, DeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Dockendorf, NoreenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Dockendorf, NoreenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Fuller, JeanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Fuller, JeanneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Greer, MichelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2013
Hernandez, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
McGowen, CherylIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
McGowen, CherylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Rice, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Rice, BarbaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Simmons, MarlaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Simmons, MarlaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Terry, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2010
Terry, BarbaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Live Oak0.9 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5
Heritage Manor of Stratmore Nursing & Rehab Ctr1.8 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5
Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation2.0 miShreveport, LA★★★★★4/5
Garden Park Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC2.7 miShreveport, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit3.0 miShreveport, LA★★☆☆☆4/5
Pierremont Healthcare Center4.0 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Bradford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation4.2 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Southern Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation4.2 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Guest House Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation4.8 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation5.4 miBossier City, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Riverview Care Center5.5 miBossier City, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Cornerstone Post Acute Care of Bossier5.6 miBossier City, LA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Shreveport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195533.