How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1980 Jefferson Hwy, Lutcher, LA 70071 (opens Google Maps) · St. James County · (225) 869-5725· 116 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. F-0698
The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. F-0693
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.04 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 49% in Louisiana; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.45 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 6% in Louisiana; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 46% in Louisiana; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 47.6 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 41.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.30, weekend 2.71.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.37 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Chateau St. James Rehab and Retirement. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boulware St James LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Thomas | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 13% | 07/03/2012 |
| Centermark Management LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 07/03/2012 |
| CKF Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 07/03/2012 |
| Lord, Gregory | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 07/03/2012 |
| Rogenmoser D'ville LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 07/03/2012 |
| Rogenmoser, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 07/03/2012 |
| Walker, Katie | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 13% | 07/03/2012 |
| Wimberly, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 07/03/2012 |
| Wright, Christopher | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware St James LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware St James LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Sandra | Individual | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
| Boulware, Sandra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2012 |
Showing 20 of 50 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 30 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southeast Louisiana War Veterans Home | 7.6 mi | Reserve, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Twin Oaks Nursing Home | 11.8 mi | Laplace, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Thibodaux Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 18.1 mi | Thibodaux, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Chateau D'ville Rehab and Retirement | 18.6 mi | Donaldsonville, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Audubon Health and Rehab | 19.1 mi | Thibodaux, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Ormond Nursing & Care Center | 19.3 mi | Destrehan, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Lafourche | 19.3 mi | Thibodaux, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195304.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details