LouisianaLutcher

Chateau St. James Rehab and Retirement

1980 Jefferson Hwy, Lutcher, LA 70071 · St. James County · 116 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1994

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.04
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
May 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 8, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss.
Nov 8, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Nov 8, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202470E
202550E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.044.043.95bottom 8% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.270.320.69top 49% in Louisiana; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.453.453.50bottom 6% in Louisiana; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.150.200.48top 46% in Louisiana; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.047.645.8
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.30, weekend 2.71. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boulware St James LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%07/03/2012
Boulware, DouglasIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, StevenIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, StevenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, ThomasIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest13%07/03/2012
Centermark Management LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%07/03/2012
CKF Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%07/03/2012
Lord, GregoryIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%07/03/2012
Rogenmoser D'ville LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%07/03/2012
Rogenmoser, RobertIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%07/03/2012
Walker, KatieIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest13%07/03/2012
Wimberly, JonathanIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%07/03/2012
Wright, ChristopherIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%07/03/2012
Boulware St James LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware St James LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, DouglasIndividual5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, DouglasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, DouglasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, SandraIndividual5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012
Boulware, SandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Southeast Louisiana War Veterans Home7.6 miReserve, LA★★★★★5/5
Twin Oaks Nursing Home11.8 miLaplace, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Thibodaux Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center18.1 miThibodaux, LA★★★★☆4/5
Chateau D'ville Rehab and Retirement18.6 miDonaldsonville, LA★★★★★5/5
Audubon Health and Rehab19.1 miThibodaux, LA★★★★☆5/5
Ormond Nursing & Care Center19.3 miDestrehan, LA★★★★★5/5
Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Lafourche19.3 miThibodaux, LA★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lutcher →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195304.