4527 Shoreline Drive, Spring Park, MN 55384 (opens Google Maps) · Hennepin County · (952) 471-4001· 60 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1977 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES (21 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 25, 2024 · F-0578
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,827.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2024 | Fine | $8,827 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.22 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 29% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.61 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 15% in Minnesota; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.89 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 18% in Minnesota; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.07 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 13% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.1 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 19% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.5 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 26% in Minnesota; top 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.26, RN 1.31, weekend 3.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.26 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lake Minnetonka Shores. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/14/2010 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2010 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2010 |
| Mielke, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2019 |
| Mielke, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2019 |
| Northeast Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2014 |
| Northeast Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2014 |
| Pederson, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Peterson, Heidi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/12/2025 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2011 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2025 |
| Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2010 |
| Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2025 |
| Sokoloski, Shaylee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2019 |
| Sokoloski, Shaylee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/11/2019 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Homes & Services — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Estates at Excelsior LLC | 4.7 mi | Excelsior, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Haven Homes of Maple Plain | 4.9 mi | Maple Plain, MN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Folkestone | 6.8 mi | Wayzata, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hope Springs at Minnetonka | 7.1 mi | Minnetonka, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Waconia and Westview Acre | 9.8 mi | Waconia, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Auburn Home in Waconia | 10.1 mi | Waconia, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Auburn Manor | 10.4 mi | Chaska, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Allina Health Restorative Suites | 10.6 mi | Plymouth, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Shakopee Friendship Manor | 10.9 mi | Shakopee, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Chapel View Health Care Center | 11.3 mi | Hopkins, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Flagstone | 11.6 mi | Eden Prairie, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hopkins Restorative Care Center | 11.7 mi | Hopkins, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hennepin, MN — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245210.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details