MinnesotaArden Hills

Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills

3220 Lake Johanna Boulevard, Arden Hills, MN 55112 · Ramsey County · 128 certified beds · avg 125 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1987

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES (21 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 6, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 22, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Aug 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100F
202480E
202531G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.954.833.95top 42% in Minnesota; top 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.961.220.69bottom 29% in Minnesota; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.564.273.50top 31% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.570.690.48bottom 46% in Minnesota; top 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)19.442.245.8top 3% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)26.738.642.9top 34% in Minnesota; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.16, RN 0.81, weekend 3.84. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Presbyterian Homes and ServicesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2020
Bremer Bank National AssociationOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2011
Bremer Bank National AssociationOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2011
Fletcher, JonathanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2025
Fletcher, JonathanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2025
Fletcher, JonathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Fletcher, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2025
Lippert, StaceyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2024
Lippert, StaceyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2024
Meyer, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1995
Meyer, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2011
Meyer, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2011
Mielke, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2019
Mielke, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2019
Pederson, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Peterson, HeidiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Peterson, HeidiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
PHS Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2011
PHS Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Langton Shores1.5 miRoseville, MN★★★★★5/5
St Anthony Health & Rehabilitation1.6 miSt Anthony, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Villas at New Brighton1.7 miNew Brighton, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
New Brighton Care Center1.8 miNew Brighton, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Estates at Roseville LLC2.2 miRoseville, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Villas at Roseville2.6 miRoseville, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Crest View Lutheran Home2.9 miColumbia Heights, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck3.0 miNew Brighton, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Bywood East Health Care3.4 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
St Anthony Park Home INC4.2 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Lyngblomsten Care Center4.3 miSaint Paul, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Catholic Eldercare on Main5.2 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Arden Hills →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245424.