How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills
3220 Lake Johanna Boulevard, Arden Hills, MN 55112 (opens Google Maps) · Ramsey County · (651) 631-6000· 128 certified beds · avg 125 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES (21 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 12, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 6, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 6, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 6, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 22, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint F-0580
View all 22 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jun 6, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMinnesota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.95
Minnesota average: 4.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.96
Minnesota average: 1.22
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.56
Minnesota average: 4.27
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.95 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 42% in Minnesota; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.96 | 1.22 | 0.69 | bottom 29% in Minnesota; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.56 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 31% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.48 | bottom 46% in Minnesota; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 19.4 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 3% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 26.7 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 34% in Minnesota; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.16, RN 0.81, weekend 3.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.16 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Homes and Services | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2020 |
| Bremer Bank National Association | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2011 |
| Bremer Bank National Association | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2011 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Lippert, Stacey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/18/2024 |
| Lippert, Stacey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/18/2024 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1995 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2011 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2011 |
| Mielke, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2019 |
| Mielke, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2019 |
| Pederson, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Peterson, Heidi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Peterson, Heidi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2011 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2025 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Homes & Services — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington — Bloomington, MN · overall 5/5
- Waverly Gardens — North Oaks, MN · overall 3/5abuse
- Deerfield Care Center, LLC — New Richmond, WI · overall 5/5
- Hallmar Village — Cedar Rapids, IA · overall 2/5
- Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC — Williamsburg, IA · overall 3/5
- Mill-Pond — Ankeny, IA · overall 5/5
- Mount Carmel Bluffs — Dubuque, IA · overall 5/5
- Prairie Gate — Council Bluffs, IA · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 19% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 96 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langton Shores | 1.5 mi | Roseville, MN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Anthony Health & Rehabilitation | 1.6 mi | St Anthony, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Villas at New Brighton | 1.7 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| New Brighton Care Center | 1.8 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Estates at Roseville LLC | 2.2 mi | Roseville, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villas at Roseville | 2.6 mi | Roseville, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Crest View Lutheran Home | 2.9 mi | Columbia Heights, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck | 3.0 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bywood East Health Care | 3.4 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| St Anthony Park Home INC | 4.2 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lyngblomsten Care Center | 4.3 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Catholic Eldercare on Main | 5.2 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Ramsey, MN — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East — Saint Paul, MN · overall 4/5
- The Emeralds at St Paul LLC — Saint Paul, MN · overall 1/5
- The Estates at Lynnhurst LLC — Saint Paul, MN · overall 1/5
- The Villas at St Paul — Saint Paul, MN · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245424.