8900 C Avenue NE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 (opens Google Maps) · Linn County · (319) 369-4638· 55 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Jan 29, 2024 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES (21 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 23, 2025 · F-0725 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Why it matters: Understaffing means longer waits for help, missed care, and higher risk of falls and other harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 3, 2024 · F-0690 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Oct 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Oct 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Oct 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Oct 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Oct 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jul 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Apr 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 28, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 13 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $11,960.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2025 | Fine | $11,960 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Iowa avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.30 | 4.37 | 3.95 | top 12% in Iowa; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.69 | top 40% in Iowa; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.90 | 3.86 | 3.50 | top 6% in Iowa; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 15% in Iowa; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.4 | 44.0 | 45.8 | bottom 29% in Iowa; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 75.0 | 42.1 | 42.9 | bottom 11% in Iowa; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.46, RN 0.72, weekend 4.12.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.46 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hallmar Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Church related
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Hill-Davis, Nancy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Hill-Davis, Nancy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Larson, Duane | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Larson, Duane | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Mercy Medical Center | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Mercy Medical Center | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/02/2025 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Peterson, Heidi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/04/2025 |
| Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
| Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/02/2025 |
| Quinn, Timothy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2023 |
Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Homes & Services — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrace Glen Village | 1.3 mi | Marion, IA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Northbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 1.5 mi | Cedar Rapids, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Winslow House Care Center | 2.6 mi | Marion, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oakview Nursing & Rehablitation - Marion | 2.6 mi | Marion, IA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hiawatha Care Center | 3.0 mi | Hiawatha, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Luke's Helen G Nassif Transitional Care Center | 3.1 mi | Cedar Rapids, IA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Linn Manor Care Center | 3.3 mi | Marion, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Silver Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC | 3.6 mi | Marion, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cottage Grove Place | 4.3 mi | Cedar Rapids, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Harmony Cedar Rapids | 4.5 mi | Cedar Rapids, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Living Center West | 5.4 mi | Cedar Rapids, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meth-Wick Health Center | 5.7 mi | Cedar Rapids, IA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Linn, IA — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165798.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details