615 Minnetonka Mills Road, Hopkins, MN 55343 (opens Google Maps) · Hennepin County · (952) 938-2761· 100 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CASSIA (16 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Apr 24, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 19, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 16, 2026 · F-0695 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint F-0695
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. F-0921
The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. F-0577
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint · F-0770 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint · F-0773 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint · F-0554 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
| Jun 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Sep 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 10 | 1 | L ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $17,345.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2025 | Fine | $17,345 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.56 | 4.83 | 3.95 | bottom 40% in Minnesota; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.42 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 24% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.14 | 4.27 | 3.50 | bottom 47% in Minnesota; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.01 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 16% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.5 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 36% in Minnesota; top 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.2 | 38.6 | 42.9 | bottom 38% in Minnesota; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.31, RN 1.34, weekend 3.91.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Chapel View Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augustana Care | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2018 |
| Cassia | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2020 |
| Brady, Jaime | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Brady, Jaime | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Brady, Jaime | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Brown, Angela | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Brown, Angela | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Cassia | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Cassia | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2025 |
| Davenport, Jessica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2025 |
| Ellingson, Erik | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Heyrman, Tara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2022 |
| Kern, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Klein, Andrew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2022 |
| Kuka, Kelly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Libbon, Paul | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Libbon, Paul | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Libbon, Paul | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Mason, Krissa | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Mason, Krissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 38 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 18 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cassia — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sholom Home West | 0.9 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hopkins Restorative Care Center | 1.3 mi | Hopkins, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Estates at St Louis Park LLC | 1.6 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villas at the Cedars | 2.0 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Villas at St Louis Park | 2.7 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villas at the Park | 3.3 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villas at Brookview | 4.1 mi | Golden Valley, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jones Harrison Residence | 4.3 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hope Springs at Minnetonka | 4.5 mi | Minnetonka, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aurora on France | 4.9 mi | Edina, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Edina | 5.1 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab Ctr | 5.2 mi | Golden Valley, MN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hennepin, MN — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245493.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details