Mount Olivet Careview Home

Name: Mount Olivet Careview Home
Address: 5517 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, Minneapolis, MN, 55419, US
Telephone: 6128275677

5517 Lyndale Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55419 · Hennepin County · 155 certified beds · avg 145 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$55,043

Fines, last 3 years

5.48

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 16, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes.
Jul 16, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	1	0	D
2024	4	1	J ▲
2025	9	0	E
2026	3	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $55,043.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jun 4, 2024	Fine	$55,043

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Minnesota avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.48	4.83	3.95	top 18% in Minnesota; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.39	1.22	0.69	top 26% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.11	4.27	3.50	top 12% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.03	0.69	0.48	top 15% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	20.9	42.2	45.8	top 5% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	28.3	38.6	42.9	top 38% in Minnesota; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.25, RN 1.33, weekend 4.90. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Mount Olivet Careview Home	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1966
Beese, Mark	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/09/2022
Beese, Mark	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/09/2022
Bent, Christine	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/09/2022
Bent, Christine	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/09/2022
Carlson, David	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2011
Carlson, David	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2011
Cartwright, Eileen	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2017
Cartwright, Eileen	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2017
Fairbairn, Scott	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Fairbairn, Scott	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/10/2025
Flack, Sharon	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2016
Flack, Sharon	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/10/2026
Gray, Kimberly	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	08/14/2024
Gray, Kimberly	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	08/14/2024
Halva, Kurt	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/09/2022
Halva, Kurt	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/09/2022
Harahan, Tana	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/13/2025
Jarcho, Ruth	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2017
Jarcho, Ruth	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Mount Olivet Home	0.0 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★★★	4/5
Grand Avenue Rest Home	1.7 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Edenbrook of Edina	1.8 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Lakehouse Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center	2.2 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Aurora on France	2.3 mi	Edina, MN	★★★★☆	3/5
The Villas at Richfield	2.9 mi	Richfield, MN	★★★☆☆	3/5
Redeemer Health Care Center	3.0 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★★★	3/5
Birchwood Care Home	3.0 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★★★	4/5
Providence Place	3.3 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Southside Care Center	3.6 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Jones Harrison Residence	4.0 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★☆☆	2/5
MN Veterans Home-Mpls	4.1 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Minneapolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245071.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Mount Olivet Careview Home

5517 Lyndale Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55419 · 6128275677

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $55,043

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jul 16, 2024 (F-0600, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
☐ "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 245071 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)