MinnesotaShakopee

Shakopee Friendship Manor

1340 Third Avenue West, Shakopee, MN 55379 · Scott County · 60 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1987

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$25,378
Fines, last 3 years
5.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 8, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 8, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jun 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 5, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360D
202430D
202550D
202611J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $25,378.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 8, 2026Fine$25,378

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.614.833.95top 16% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.041.220.69bottom 40% in Minnesota; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.194.273.50top 10% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.690.48bottom 38% in Minnesota; top 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.042.245.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.07, RN 0.94, weekend 4.69. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Probst, SethIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2024
Fairbairn, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Fairbairn, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Mohlin, JamieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Mohlin, JamieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Probst, SethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Probst, SethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
St Gertrudes Health & Rehabilitation Center2.7 miShakopee, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Auburn Manor2.7 miChaska, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Flagstone6.8 miEden Prairie, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Estates at Excelsior LLC7.3 miExcelsior, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Friendship Village of Bloomington8.6 miBloomington, MN★★★★☆3/5
Hope Springs at Minnetonka8.8 miMinnetonka, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center9.6 miBloomington, MN★★★★★4/5
Hopkins Restorative Care Center10.7 miHopkins, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lake Minnetonka Shores10.9 miSpring Park, MN★★★★★4/5
Chapel View Health Care Center11.6 miHopkins, MN★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Shakopee →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245445.