New YorkBrooklyn

Palm Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation

615 Avenue C, Brooklyn, NY 11218 · Kings County · 240 certified beds · avg 232 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1971

Part of chain: SHIMON LEFKOWITZ (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Dec 3, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Dec 3, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Aug 31, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110D
202380F
202570E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.823.583.95bottom 15% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.520.680.69bottom 39% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.613.133.50bottom 23% in New York; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.700.480.48top 16% in New York; top 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.540.345.8top 32% in New York; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.239.842.9bottom 49% in New York; top 44% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.34, RN 0.79, weekend 4.02. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lefkowitz, ShimonIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/06/2007
Lefkowitz, ShimonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/06/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Caton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, LLC0.7 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆4/5
Ditmas Park Care Center0.8 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing1.3 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
The Heritage Rehabilitation and Health Care Center1.3 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★5/5
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare1.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Norwegian Christian Home and Health Center1.9 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆4/5
Dr Susan Smith McKinney Nursing and Rehabilitation2.2 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★5/5
Rutland Nursing Home, INC2.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.5 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare2.7 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio2.9 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Oxford Nursing Home3.0 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brooklyn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335328.