How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Villa at Stamford, the
88 Rockrimmon Road, Stamford, CT 06903 (opens Google Maps) · Western Ct County · (203) 322-3428· 128 certified beds · avg 126 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 30, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
—
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
View all 23 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jun 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Jan 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Feb 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 13, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 13, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityConnecticut averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: Not reported
Connecticut average: 3.80
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: Not reported
Connecticut average: 0.70
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: Not reported
Connecticut average: 3.43
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | — | 3.80 | 3.95 | — |
| Registered Nurse hours | — | 0.70 | 0.69 | — |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | — | 3.43 | 3.50 | — |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | — | 0.46 | 0.48 | — |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.8 | 37.4 | 45.8 | bottom 9% in Connecticut; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 55.0 | 38.6 | 42.9 | bottom 20% in Connecticut; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total —, RN —, weekend —.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (— here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Villa at Stamford, the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Regional context: $525.78/day — Connecticut statewide average for a semi-private nursing-facility room, September 30, 2025. This is a historical regional figure, not this facility's price or a prediction. View the OPM source.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehm, Shlomo | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/09/2016 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Smith House Ventures LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Allen, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Allen, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Boehm, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Diteodoro, Jack | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Diteodoro, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Diteodoro, Jack | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Lyon, Lynn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Lyon, Lynn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Lyon, Lynn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Showstead, Peter | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2016 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Center Management Group — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Bishop McCarthy Center for Rehab & Healthcare — Vineland, NJ · overall 2/5
- Lincoln Park Care Center — Lincoln Park, NJ · overall 1/5
- Lincoln Park Renaissance — Lincoln Park, NJ · overall 4/5
- Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Pleasantville, NJ · overall 4/5
- St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Cherry Hill, NJ · overall 3/5
- Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care — Brookhaven, NY · overall 2/5
- Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care — New Rochelle, NY · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 23 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 58 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civita Care Center at Long Ridge | 3.2 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Waveny Care Center | 3.6 mi | New Canaan, CT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edgehill Health Center | 5.5 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Stamford Care Center | 6.0 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Nathaniel Witherell, the | 6.4 mi | Greenwich, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation at St. Camillus | 6.5 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Norwalk Care Center | 7.5 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Norwalk | 7.6 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Notre Dame Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.7 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wilton Meadows Health Care Center | 7.9 mi | Wilton, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation | 8.9 mi | Greenwich, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| King Street Home INC | 9.6 mi | Port Chester, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Western Ct, CT — 20 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Glen Hill — Danbury, CT · overall 4/5
- Bethel Health Care Center — Bethel, CT · overall 4/5
- Civita Care Center at Danbury — Danbury, CT · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075153.