How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio
810 20 St. Marks Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11213 (opens Google Maps) · Kings County · (718) 467-7300· 295 certified beds · avg 289 residents/day · certified since Jun 16, 1977 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ALLURE GROUP (6 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 19, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.35
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint F-0580
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint F-0657
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
View all 29 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Feb 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Feb 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 12).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.35
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.83
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.77
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.35 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in New York; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 19% in New York; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.77 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 35% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 37% in New York; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.4 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 26% in New York; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 49.1 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 27% in New York; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 0.87, weekend 2.92.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.53 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basch, Jack | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 01/24/2014 |
| Landau, Joel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 01/24/2014 |
| Rubin, Marvin | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 01/24/2014 |
| Rubin, Solomon | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 01/24/2014 |
| Allure Care Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Alpha Rehabilitation Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Basch, Jack | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Basch, Jack | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Hak, Virender | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Hak, Virender | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Landau, Joel | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Landau, Joel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Rice, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/12/2021 |
| Rice, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2025 |
| Rubin, Marvin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Rubin, Marvin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Rubin, Solomon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| Rubin, Solomon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| St Marks Avenue Property LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
| St Marks Avenue Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2014 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Allure Group — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L — New York, NY · overall 3/5
- King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Linden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Bedford Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 29% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 20 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 269 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential | 0.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brooklyn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 0.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Dr Susan Smith McKinney Nursing and Rehabilitation | 0.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rutland Nursing Home, INC | 0.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Concord Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.2 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Schulman and Schachne Institute for Nursing and Re | 1.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Buena Vida Rehab and Nursing Center | 1.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care | 2.0 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| New Carlton Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC | 2.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oxford Nursing Home | 2.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Kings, NY — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Ditmas Park Care Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Four Seasons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Haym Solomon Home for the Aged — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335609.