New YorkBrooklyn

Concord Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

300 Madison Street, Brooklyn, NY 11216 · Kings County · 140 certified beds · avg 138 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1976

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 13, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Mar 13, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Mar 13, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Dec 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 26, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230D
202460E
202510D
2026130E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.723.583.95bottom 10% in New York; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.680.69bottom 24% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.493.133.50bottom 14% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.480.48top 44% in New York; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.240.345.8top 49% in New York; top 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.139.842.9bottom 41% in New York; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.55, weekend 3.01. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Butler, EricaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Gaddy, CraigIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Gaddy, CraigIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Phillips, SamuelIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Phillips, SamuelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Pilgrim, DeidreIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Pilgrim, DeidreIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Wiltshire, AlbertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Wiltshire, AlbertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center0.9 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio1.1 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Brooklyn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.2 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Bedford Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation1.2 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★5/5
New Carlton Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC1.3 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆3/5
Buena Vida Rehab and Nursing Center1.3 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Oxford Nursing Home1.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential1.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing Center1.7 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
Dr Susan Smith McKinney Nursing and Rehabilitation1.8 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brooklyn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335538.