How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L
30 West 138th Street, New York, NY 10037 (opens Google Maps) · New York County · (212) 690-7400· 200 certified beds · avg 197 residents/day · certified since Feb 4, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ALLURE GROUP (6 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 12, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 3, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 24, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 28 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
View all 28 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 3, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint · F-0688 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care or assistance for a resident who uses a prosthesis, such as an artificial limb. · F-0696 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways. · F-0924 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 11 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.13
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.73
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.64
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.13 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 33% in New York; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 28% in New York; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.64 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 26% in New York; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 28% in New York; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.5 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in New York; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 52.8 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 22% in New York; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.86, RN 0.90, weekend 3.26.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.86 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landau, Joel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 12/07/2018 |
| Rubin, Marvin | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 12/07/2018 |
| Rubin, Solomon | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 12/07/2018 |
| Allure Care Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
| Allure Care Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/19/2025 |
| Alpha Rehabilitation Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
| Ayinla, Raji | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2014 |
| Ayinla, Raji | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/19/2025 |
| Cesar, Thara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2020 |
| Cesar, Thara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2025 |
| Harlem Center Properties LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
| Harlem Center Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
| Landau, Joel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
| Rubin, Marvin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
| Rubin, Solomon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
| Rubin, Solomon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2018 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Allure Group — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Linden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Bedford Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio — Brooklyn, NY · overall 3/5
- Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How does your quality committee work, and can you share an example of a problem it identified and fixed?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 51% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 16 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 305 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent | 0.7 mi | New York, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility | 0.8 mi | Manhattan, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Mary's Center INC | 1.0 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Highbridge Woodycrest Center | 1.2 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Concourse Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, INC | 1.4 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992) | 1.6 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center | 1.6 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| The New Jewish Home, Manhattan | 1.7 mi | New York, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hope Center for Hiv and Nursing Care | 2.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bronxcare Special Care Center | 2.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| St Vincent Depaul Residence | 2.2 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in New York, NY — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Isabella Geriatric Center INC — New York, NY · overall 2/5
- Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC — New York, NY · overall 5/5
- New East Side Nursing Home — New York, NY · overall 5/5
- New Gouverneur Hospital SNF — New York, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335522.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).