The New Jewish Home, Manhattan

120 West 106th Street, New York, NY 10025 (opens Google Maps) · New York County · (212) 870-5000· 514 certified beds · avg 405 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Nov 7, 2024

Serious findings on record

most recent Nov 8, 2024

$134,514

Fines, last 3 years

3.74

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 26, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Dec 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 8, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 8, 2024 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint

The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.

Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.

Corrected: Jan 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Nov 8, 2024G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
Nov 8, 2024G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint F-0604
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550

View all 29 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Nov 8, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Nov 8, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550
Nov 7, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Nov 7, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Nov 7, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Nov 7, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Nov 7, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Nov 7, 2024	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Oct 26, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Oct 26, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Oct 26, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Oct 26, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Oct 26, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Oct 26, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Oct 26, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Oct 26, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740
Oct 26, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Oct 26, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Oct 26, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610
Dec 23, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Dec 23, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2021

2023

2024

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2021	9	0	E
2023	11	1	J ▲
2024	9	2	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

2 fines totaling $134,514.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Nov 8, 2024	Fine	$71,858
Oct 26, 2023	Fine	$62,656

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityNew York averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.74

3.58

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.79

0.68

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

3.26

3.13

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	New York avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.74	3.58	3.95	top 35% in New York; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.79	0.68	0.69	top 23% in New York; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.26	3.13	3.50	top 34% in New York; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.61	0.48	0.48	top 22% in New York; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	30.8	40.3	45.8	top 31% in New York; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	22.9	39.8	42.9	top 15% in New York; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.90, RN 0.82, weekend 3.40.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.90 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The New Jewish Home, Manhattan. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Altschuler, Alan	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/02/2021
Barkan, Mel	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/16/2003
Bernstein, Daniel	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/04/2013
Blumstein, William	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/03/1979
Evans, Bruce	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/23/2006
Evans, Bruce	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2019
Farber, Jeffrey	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2018
Feiner, Lisa	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2000
Freedman, Margot	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/1990
Freeman, David	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/03/1988
Glickman, Susan	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/07/1984
Hansen, Scott	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/26/2011
Hess, Peter	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/18/2015
Hochberg, Johnathan	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/21/2005
Javits, Tom	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2022
Jewish Home Lifecare	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2018
JHL Corporate Services INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/06/2009
Kummel, William	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/16/2010
Lippman, Lisa	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/03/2014
Luskin, Michael	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/06/1997

Showing 20 of 38 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 18 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 31% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 38 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 301 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992)	0.3 mi	New York, NY	★★★★★	4/5
Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center	0.7 mi	New York, NY	★★★★☆	3/5
The Riverside	1.1 mi	New York, NY	★★★★★	4/5
St Mary's Center INC	1.1 mi	New York, NY	★★★★★	4/5
Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility	1.2 mi	Manhattan, NY	★★★☆☆	3/5
Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent	1.3 mi	New York, NY	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	1.6 mi	New York City, NY	★★★★★	4/5
Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L	1.7 mi	New York, NY	★★★☆☆	2/5
Hudsonview Health Care Center	1.8 mi	North Bergen, NJ	★★★★★	4/5
Complete Care at Harborage LLC	1.8 mi	North Bergen, NJ	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC	2.3 mi	New York, NY	★★★★★	4/5
New York Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing	2.7 mi	Astoria, NY	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in New York, NY — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

West Village Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — New York, NY · overall 5/5
Coler Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center — Roosevelt Island, NY · overall 5/5
Fort Tryon Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing — New York, NY · overall 5/5
Glen Arden INC — Goshen, NY · overall 3/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in New York →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335491.