New YorkNew York

Isabella Geriatric Center INC

515 Audubon Avenue, New York, NY 10040 · New York County · 705 certified beds · avg 684 residents/day · certified since Apr 4, 1972

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$8,422
Fines, last 3 years
3.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Dec 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Dec 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Dec 16, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Nov 19, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 19, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 19, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202030D
202290E
202310E
202490E
202530D
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,422.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 23, 2025Fine$8,422

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.303.583.95bottom 43% in New York; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.810.680.69top 21% in New York; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.983.133.50top 50% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.480.48top 21% in New York; top 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.540.345.8bottom 42% in New York; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.939.842.9top 49% in New York; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.78, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Adams, AncaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2022
Anthony, RiaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2017
Balko, AlexanderIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Balko, AlexanderIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Cortes, TaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Davis, JeffreyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Davis, JeffreyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Gormley, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Goshin, ArthurIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Harding, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Koschitzki, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Leonel, RenatoIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2017
Lipton, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2007
Meliambro, RoccoIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Princivil-Barnett, LoyolaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Richardson, HilaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2007
Talbot, IrwinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2007
Wagner, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Wagner, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Weatherly, CarolIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Fort Tryon Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing0.4 miNew York, NY★★★★★4/5
Hope Center for Hiv and Nursing Care0.8 miBronx, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Casa Promesa1.3 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5
University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing1.5 miBronx, NY★★★★☆4/5
Highbridge Woodycrest Center1.6 miBronx, NY★★★★☆4/5
Concourse Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, INC1.7 miBronx, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Fordham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.7 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆3/5
The Plaza Rehab and Nursing Center1.7 miBronx, NY★★★★★4/5
Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing1.8 miBronx, NY★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Independence Care Center for Nursing and Rehabilit1.9 miRiverdale, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Bronx Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.0 miBronx, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Bronxcare Special Care Center2.0 miBronx, NY★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New York →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335100.