515 Audubon Avenue, New York, NY 10040 (opens Google Maps) · New York County · (212) 342-9200· 705 certified beds · avg 684 residents/day · certified since Apr 4, 1972 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Dec 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Dec 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 28, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · F-0570 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Nov 19, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 19, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Nov 19, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,422.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2025 | Fine | $8,422 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.30 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in New York; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 21% in New York; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.98 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 50% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 21% in New York; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.5 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 42% in New York; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.9 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 49% in New York; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.78, weekend 2.90.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.21 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Isabella Geriatric Center INC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams, Anca | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/21/2022 |
| Anthony, Ria | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2017 |
| Balko, Alexander | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Balko, Alexander | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Cortes, Tara | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| Davis, Jeffrey | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Davis, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Gormley, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Goshin, Arthur | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Harding, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1996 |
| Koschitzki, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Leonel, Renato | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2017 |
| Lipton, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2007 |
| Meliambro, Rocco | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Princivil-Barnett, Loyola | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Richardson, Hila | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2007 |
| Talbot, Irwin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2007 |
| Wagner, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Wagner, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Weatherly, Carol | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2017 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Tryon Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 0.4 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hope Center for Hiv and Nursing Care | 0.8 mi | Bronx, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Casa Promesa | 1.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.5 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Highbridge Woodycrest Center | 1.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Concourse Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, INC | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fordham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Plaza Rehab and Nursing Center | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.8 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Independence Care Center for Nursing and Rehabilit | 1.9 mi | Riverdale, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bronx Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bronxcare Special Care Center | 2.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in New York, NY — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335100.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details