New York ›New York

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1339 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 (opens Google Maps) · New York County · (646) 475-4800· 362 certified beds · avg 332 residents/day · certified since Oct 6, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: ARCHCARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 9, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint F-0580

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 1, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Dec 1, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Dec 1, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Sep 9, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Sep 9, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jan 13, 2022F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jan 13, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
Jan 13, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jan 13, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jan 13, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250F
202320D
202550D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.34
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.18
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.87
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.343.583.95bottom 45% in New York; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.180.680.69top 6% in New York; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.873.133.50bottom 43% in New York; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.980.480.48top 7% in New York; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.340.345.8top 30% in New York; top 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)39.139.842.9bottom 47% in New York; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 1.31, weekend 3.19.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alberto, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Augustine, GemmaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Bujno, StephenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Cahill, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Catholic Healthcare SystemsOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2005
Cortes, TaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Covone, AnnmarieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2009
Covone, AnnmarieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Fahey, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Feldmann, EricIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Gleason, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Gray, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Johnson, ClarionIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Kasergrande, LeslieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Kelleher, RoryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2009
Lamorte, JosephIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2019
Larue, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2007
Larue, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Mirza, TaimurIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2024
Mirza, TaimurIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2025

Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Archcare — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
  • "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 302 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Coler Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center0.7 miRoosevelt Island, NY★★★★★5/5
Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center0.8 miNew York City, NY★★★★★4/5
New York Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing1.6 miAstoria, NY★★★★★5/5
Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center1.9 miNew York, NY★★★★☆3/5
The Riverside2.2 miNew York, NY★★★★★4/5
The New Jewish Home, Manhattan2.3 miNew York, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility2.6 miManhattan, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992)2.6 miNew York, NY★★★★★4/5
Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent2.8 miNew York, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Queens Boulevard Extended Care Facility3.0 miWoodside, NY★★★★☆4/5
Complete Care at Harborage LLC3.0 miNorth Bergen, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Regal Heights Rehabilitation and Health Care Cente3.2 miJackson Heights, NY★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in New York, NY — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in New York →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335050.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details