How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
St Vincent Depaul Residence
900 Intervale Avenue, Bronx, NY 10459 (opens Google Maps) · Bronx County · (718) 589-6965· 200 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Oct 29, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ARCHCARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 8, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. F-0847
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 7, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 7, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 7, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Aug 5, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Aug 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.51
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.07
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.24
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.51 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 45% in New York; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.07 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 9% in New York; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.24 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 36% in New York; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.97 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 7% in New York; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.9 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 35% in New York; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 27% in New York; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.40, RN 1.03, weekend 3.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.40 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Vincent Depaul Residence. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Augustine, Gemma | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Bujno, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Cahill, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Catholic Health Care Systems | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2005 |
| Cortes, Tara | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Covone, Annmarie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2009 |
| Covone, Annmarie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2009 |
| Fahey, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Feldmann, Eric | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Gleason, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Gray, Karen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Johnson, Clarion | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Kasergrande, Leslie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Kelleher, Rory | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2009 |
| Lamorte, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2019 |
| Larue, Scott | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2014 |
| Larue, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| O'Brien, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Park, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Archcare — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center — New York, NY · overall 4/5
- Archcare at Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Ce — Staten Island, NY · overall 4/5
- Archcare at Providence Rest — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
- Carmel Richmond Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cent — Staten Island, NY · overall 5/5
- Ferncliff Nursing Home Co INC — Rhinebeck, NY · overall 2/5abuse
- Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC — New York, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
- "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How does your quality committee work, and can you share an example of a problem it identified and fixed?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 46% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 32 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 298 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronxcare Special Care Center | 1.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.2 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Concourse Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, INC | 1.5 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bronx Center for Rehabilitation & Health Care | 1.9 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Highbridge Woodycrest Center | 1.9 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Casa Promesa | 2.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Grand Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.0 mi | Bronx, NY | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L | 2.2 mi | New York, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hope Center for Hiv and Nursing Care | 2.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bronx Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent | 2.5 mi | New York, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility | 2.5 mi | Manhattan, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Bronx, NY — 44 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Plaza Rehab and Nursing Center — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
- Throgs Neck Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Bronx, NY · overall 3/5
- University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing — Bronx, NY · overall 4/5
- Wayne Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation — Bronx, NY · overall 3/5
- Williamsbridge Center for Rehabilitation and Nrsg — Bronx, NY · overall 4/5
- Workmens Circle Multicare Center — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
- Archcare at Providence Rest — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335763.