New YorkNew York

Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent

116 East 125th Street, New York, NY 10035 · New York County · 320 certified beds · avg 315 residents/day · certified since Jan 4, 1996

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$67,412
Fines, last 3 years
2.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 16, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 16, 2025 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 30, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 30, 2024 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 16, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 5, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202190F
202360F
202422G ▲
2025112G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $67,412.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 16, 2025Fine$12,298
Apr 30, 2024Fine$55,114

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.723.583.95bottom 10% in New York; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.380.680.69bottom 11% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.463.133.50bottom 12% in New York; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.480.48bottom 31% in New York; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)22.640.345.8top 9% in New York; top 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.839.842.9top 22% in New York; top 23% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.44, weekend 2.86. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Hurwitz, BarbaraIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%01/01/1996
Rausman, ChaimIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%01/01/1996
Rausman, MichaelIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%01/01/1996
Green, RivkaIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Hurwitz, BarbaraIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Klein, MordechaiIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2008
Klein, MordechaiIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Rausman, ChaimIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Rausman, DesireIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Rausman, MichaelIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Rausman, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Rausman, NormanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Rausman, NormanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Rausman, SuriIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Weits, BrachaIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility0.1 miManhattan, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L0.7 miNew York, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center1.0 miNew York, NY★★★★☆3/5
St Mary's Center INC1.1 miNew York, NY★★★★★4/5
Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992)1.3 miNew York, NY★★★★★4/5
The New Jewish Home, Manhattan1.3 miNew York, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Highbridge Woodycrest Center1.9 miBronx, NY★★★★☆4/5
Concourse Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, INC2.1 miBronx, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
New York Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing2.3 miAstoria, NY★★★★★5/5
Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing2.3 miBronx, NY★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Riverside2.4 miNew York, NY★★★★★4/5
Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.4 miNew York City, NY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New York →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335792.