How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992)
1060 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10025 (opens Google Maps) · New York County · (212) 316-7700· 409 certified beds · avg 403 residents/day · certified since Nov 12, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 6, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| May 6, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.13
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.55
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.78
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.13 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 34% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 47% in New York; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.78 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 36% in New York; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 33% in New York; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.6 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 24% in New York; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.6 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in New York; top 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.40, RN 0.60, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.40 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992). CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackstein, Moshe | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2022 |
| Blackstein, Moshe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2022 |
| Blackstein, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2022 |
| Callaway, James | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/1998 |
| Davis, James | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Davis, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Davis, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Davis, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Edmonds, R. Scott | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2024 |
| Hoopes, Joseph | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2019 |
| Hoopes, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2019 |
| Landman, Pamela | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Landman, Pamela | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Olivieri, Frances | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2018 |
| Pancirer, Mark | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Pancirer, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Pancirer, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Poon, Lorna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/29/2016 |
| Poon, Lorna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/29/2016 |
| Sadeghizangeneh, Arghavan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/10/2024 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 29% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 23 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 303 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The New Jewish Home, Manhattan | 0.3 mi | New York, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Mary's Center INC | 0.8 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center | 0.9 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility | 1.2 mi | Manhattan, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent | 1.3 mi | New York, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Riverside | 1.3 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L | 1.6 mi | New York, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hudsonview Health Care Center | 1.7 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Harborage LLC | 1.9 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.9 mi | New York City, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Highbridge Woodycrest Center | 2.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC | 2.6 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in New York, NY — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Coler Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center — Roosevelt Island, NY · overall 5/5
- Fort Tryon Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing — New York, NY · overall 5/5
- Glen Arden INC — Goshen, NY · overall 3/5
- Isabella Geriatric Center INC — New York, NY · overall 2/5
- New East Side Nursing Home — New York, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335570.