LouisianaBossier City

Riverview Care Center

4820 Medical Drive, Bossier City, LA 71112 · Bossier County · 135 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Sep 15, 2000

Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$24,251
Fines, last 3 years
4.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 18, 2025 · F-0658 · triggered by a complaint

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 18, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 13, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 27, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 23, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 18, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Oct 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Oct 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202361G ▲
202490E
202592J ▲
202611G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $24,251.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 23, 2026Fine$16,350
Sep 13, 2023Fine$7,901

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.184.043.95top 38% in Louisiana; top 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.340.320.69top 26% in Louisiana; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.473.453.50top 46% in Louisiana; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.200.48top 25% in Louisiana; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.947.645.8top 42% in Louisiana; top 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.741.642.9top 15% in Louisiana; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.33, weekend 3.30. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Act Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%10/01/2023
David & Felicia Stallard Child TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%10/01/2023
Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr UaOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%10/01/2023
Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2023
Joseph & Alison Sadler Children TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2023
Medico LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest85%10/01/2023
Account Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Aura, AlbertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Beebe, BobbyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Beebe, BobbyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Elton G Beebe Family Mortage TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Flannery Oaks Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Four Generations Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Manasco, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Manasco, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Parkinson, ToniIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Pathway Management of Louisiana LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Pathway Management of Louisiana LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Pharmaceutical Consulting Services of America LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cornerstone Post Acute Care of Bossier0.1 miBossier City, LA★★★★★5/5
Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation0.1 miBossier City, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Northwest Louisiana Veterans Home2.4 miBossier City, LA★★★★☆5/5
Heritage Manor of Stratmore Nursing & Rehab Ctr3.8 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5
Pierremont Healthcare Center4.5 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Live Oak4.9 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆4/5
Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit5.0 miShreveport, LA★★☆☆☆4/5
Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation5.0 miShreveport, LA★★★★★4/5
Highland Place Rehab and Nursing Center5.0 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Magnolia Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC5.5 miShreveport, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Village Health Care at the Glen5.5 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation5.5 miBossier City, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bossier City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195497.