LouisianaAlexandria

The Summit

2200 Memorial Drive, Alexandria, LA 71301 · Rapides County · 130 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Sep 26, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$14,287
Fines, last 3 years
3.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202352J ▲
202480E
202550E
202690D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,287.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 14, 2023Fine$14,287

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.624.043.95bottom 31% in Louisiana; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.220.320.69bottom 36% in Louisiana; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.053.453.50bottom 30% in Louisiana; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.200.48bottom 30% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.847.645.8top 36% in Louisiana; top 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.22, weekend 2.96. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
David & Felicia Stallard Child TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%08/01/2009
Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr UaOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%08/01/2009
Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/01/2009
Joseph & Alison Sadler Children TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/01/2009
Medico LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest85%08/01/2009
Account Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Account Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr NGOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Beebe, BobbyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Beebe, BobbyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Beebe, EltonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2009
Beebe, EltonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Beverly, AngelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2012
Felicias 2016 Fam Tr No 2OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Guillot, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2013
Guillot, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2013
LTC Him Consulting INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Regency House of Alexandria1.1 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Belle Grande Nursing and Rehabilitation Center2.3 miAlexandria, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Lexington House2.4 miAlexandria, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Matthews Memorial Health Care Center2.5 miAlexandria, LA★★☆☆☆2/5
Legacy Nursing at St. Christina3.4 miPineville, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center5.3 miPineville, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Oaks Care Center6.4 miPineville, LA★★★★☆5/5
Tioga Community Care Center8.0 miPineville, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center15.7 miCenter Point, LA★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Pollock16.4 miPollock, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Alexandria →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195560.