2200 Memorial Drive, Alexandria, LA 71301 (opens Google Maps) · Rapides County · (318) 445-4300· 130 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Sep 26, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jun 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint · F-0693 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint · F-0557 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $14,287.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2023 | Fine | $14,287 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.62 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Louisiana; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.69 | bottom 36% in Louisiana; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.05 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 30% in Louisiana; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 30% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.8 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 36% in Louisiana; top 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 41.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.22, weekend 2.96.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Summit. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David & Felicia Stallard Child Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 08/01/2009 |
| Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr Ua | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 08/01/2009 |
| Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2009 |
| Joseph & Alison Sadler Children Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2009 |
| Medico LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 85% | 08/01/2009 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr NG | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2009 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Beverly, Angela | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/29/2012 |
| Felicias 2016 Fam Tr No 2 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Guillot, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2013 |
| Guillot, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2013 |
| LTC Him Consulting INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2007 |
Showing 20 of 41 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 21 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency House of Alexandria | 1.1 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Belle Grande Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lexington House | 2.4 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Matthews Memorial Health Care Center | 2.5 mi | Alexandria, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Legacy Nursing at St. Christina | 3.4 mi | Pineville, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | Pineville, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Oaks Care Center | 6.4 mi | Pineville, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Tioga Community Care Center | 8.0 mi | Pineville, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 15.7 mi | Center Point, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Pollock | 16.4 mi | Pollock, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195560.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details