LouisianaBossier City

Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

1524 Doctors Drive, Bossier City, LA 71111 · Bossier County · 155 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 2004

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
6
Serious findings on record
$186,253
Fines, last 3 years
2.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 26, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 26, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Aug 1, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Aug 1, 2024 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 1, 2024 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 3, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Dec 4, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024145L ▲
202521G ▲
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $186,253, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 3, 2025Fine$12,425
Sep 3, 2025Payment Denial13 days from Oct 16, 2025
Dec 4, 2024Fine$52,855
Aug 1, 2024Fine$120,973

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.974.043.95bottom 7% in Louisiana; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.190.320.69bottom 22% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.613.453.50bottom 10% in Louisiana; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.160.200.48top 39% in Louisiana; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)69.347.645.8bottom 6% in Louisiana; bottom 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.40, RN 0.22, weekend 2.99. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bauder, WilliamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Boulware, DouglasIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Boulware, StevenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
SDB HoldingsOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2019
Adams, AngelaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2018
Almond, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/18/2025
Angelo, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2025
Bauder, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Boulware, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Colvin, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2025
Priority Management Group, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Priority Management Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heritage Manor Health & Rehab0.9 miBossier City, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Adira Medical Resort3.1 miBossier City, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Northwest Louisiana Veterans Home3.2 miBossier City, LA★★★★☆5/5
Highland Place Rehab and Nursing Center3.4 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.9 miBossier City, LA★★★★☆4/5
Harmony House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, I4.3 miShreveport, LA★★★★☆5/5
Old Brownlee Community Care Center4.4 miBossier City, LA★★★★★4/5
Magnolia Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC4.8 miShreveport, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Claiborne Healthcare Center4.9 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Shreveport Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation5.3 miShreveport, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.3 miShreveport, LA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Progressive Care Center5.4 miShreveport, LA★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bossier City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195594.