How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Renaissance Manor on Cabot
279 Cabot Street, Holyoke, MA 01040 (opens Google Maps) · Hampden County · (508) 638-5614· 61 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Mar 2, 1989 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 22, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. F-0690
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. F-0726
The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint F-0557
View all 22 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Sep 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Oct 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint · F-0557 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Oct 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Aug 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 15
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 15 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMassachusetts averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.71
Massachusetts average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.23
Massachusetts average: 0.65
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.17
Massachusetts average: 3.51
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.71 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 47% in Massachusetts; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.23 | 0.65 | 0.69 | top 5% in Massachusetts; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.17 | 3.51 | 3.50 | bottom 37% in Massachusetts; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.93 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 5% in Massachusetts; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.5 | 38.2 | 45.8 | top 41% in Massachusetts; top 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 16.7 | 42.6 | 42.9 | top 7% in Massachusetts; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 1.25, weekend 3.21.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.76 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Renaissance Manor on Cabot. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/01/2015 |
| Gen Operations I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/01/2015 |
| Gen Operations II LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/01/2015 |
| Genesis Healthcare INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/01/2015 |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/01/2015 |
| Skilled Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/01/2015 |
| Summit Care LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2015 |
| Summit Care Parent LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/01/2015 |
| Sun Healthcare Group INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2023 |
| Whitman, Arnold | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2023 |
| Berg, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Morris, Diane | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Nussman, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2020 |
| Nussman, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2020 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Genesis Healthcare — 184 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Doctors Community Rehabilitation and Patient Care — Lanham, MD · overall 3/5
- Fairland Center — Silver Spring, MD · overall 2/5
- Franklin Woods Center — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
- Hammonds Lane Center — Brooklyn Park, MD · overall 3/5
- Larkin Chase Center — Bowie, MD · overall 5/5
- Waldorf Center — Waldorf, MD · overall 4/5
- Cedar Ridge Center — Skowhegan, ME · overall 3/5
- Harbor Hill Center — Belfast, ME · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 183 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
- "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Massachusetts midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 35% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 38 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regalcare at Holyoke | 0.1 mi | Holyoke, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Massachusetts Veterans Home at Holyoke | 1.1 mi | Holyoke, MA | —/5 | ||
| Day Brook Village Senior Living | 1.3 mi | Holyoke, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Care One at Holyoke | 2.0 mi | Holyoke, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| South Hadley Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.2 mi | South Hadley, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mission Care at Holyoke | 2.3 mi | Holyoke, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Mont Marie Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 2.5 mi | Holyoke, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mary's Meadow at Providence Place | 3.2 mi | Holyoke, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Vantage at West Springfield LLC | 3.5 mi | West Springfield, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Chicopee Rehabilitation and Nursing | 4.7 mi | Chicopee, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing | 7.7 mi | Springfield, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Care One at Northampton | 8.6 mi | Northampton, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hampden, MA — 26 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Sixteen Acres Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC — Springfield, MA · overall 4/5
- Vantage at Hampden LLC — Hampden, MA · overall 3/5
- Vantage at Westfield LLC — Westfield, MA · overall 2/5
- Westfield Rehabilitation and Health Center — Westfield, MA · overall 2/5
- Agawam East Rehab and Nursing — Agawam, MA · overall 5/5
- Agawam North Rehab and Nursing — Agawam, MA · overall 1/5
- Agawam South Rehab and Nursing — Agawam, MA · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225352.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).