Larkin Chase Center

Name: Larkin Chase Center
Address: 15005 HEALTH CENTER DRIVE, Bowie, MD, 20716, US
Telephone: 3018056070

15005 Health Center Drive, Bowie, MD 20716 · Prince Georges County · 120 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since May 2, 1994

Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$127,440

Fines, last 3 years

3.06

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 14, 2026 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 28, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 14, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Corrected: Jun 26, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 14, 2026	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 14, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 14, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.
Jun 14, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jun 14, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 14, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 14, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Nov 1, 2018	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Nov 1, 2018	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 1, 2018	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Nov 1, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Nov 1, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 1, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 1, 2018	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jul 13, 2017	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not store, cook, or serve food in a safe and clean way.
Jul 13, 2017	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not employ or bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service it couldn't staff itself. When a facility lacks an in-house expert, it must contract with one.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2017	2	0	E
2018	7	0	E
2022	7	0	E
2026	9	2	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $127,440.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Apr 14, 2026	Fine	$127,440

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.06	3.83	3.95	bottom 10% in Maryland; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.02	0.83	0.69	top 18% in Maryland; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.69	3.43	3.50	bottom 7% in Maryland; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.94	0.63	0.48	top 13% in Maryland; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	40.2	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.7	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 1.23, weekend 3.24. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/01/2012
Gen Operations I LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/01/2012
Gen Operations II LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/01/2012
Genesis Healthcare INC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/01/2012
Genesis Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/02/2015
Sun Healthcare Group INC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/02/2015
Sunbridge Healthcare LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	04/20/2007
Whitman, Arnold	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/01/2012
Berg, Michael	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2012
Bridgeford, Laura	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Harborside Healthcare Advisors Limited Partnership	Organization	Limited Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	04/20/2007
Harborside Healthcare Limited Partnership	Organization	Limited Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	04/20/2007
Harborside Healthcare LLC	Organization	Limited Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	04/20/2007
Khi LLC	Organization	General Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	04/20/2007
Maryland Harborside LLC	Organization	General Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	02/02/2015
Mendelson, Avi	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Morris, Diane	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/27/2023
Morris, Diane	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/27/2023
Radcliffe, Stacey	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Villa Rosa Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC	4.4 mi	Mitchellville, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Crofton	5.4 mi	Crofton, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Largo Nursing and Rehabiliation Center	5.9 mi	Glenarden, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Future Care Capital Region	6.6 mi	Landover, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Doctors Community Rehabilitation and Patient Care	6.8 mi	Lanham, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Waugh Chapel	7.3 mi	Gambrills, MD	★★★★★	4/5
Future Care Annapolis	8.6 mi	Annapolis, MD		—/5
Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	9.3 mi	Crownsville, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
South River Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	9.9 mi	Edgewater, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Ginger Cove	10.0 mi	Annapolis, MD	★★★★☆	5/5
Forestville Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	10.1 mi	Forestville, MD	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Deanwood Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	10.6 mi	Washington, DC	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bowie →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215264.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Larkin Chase Center

15005 Health Center Drive, Bowie, MD 20716 · 3018056070

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $127,440

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Apr 14, 2026 (F-0580, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
▲ Apr 14, 2026 (F-0684, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 215264 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)