Hammonds Lane Center

613 Hammonds Lane, Brooklyn Park, MD 21225 (opens Google Maps) · Anne Arundel County · (410) 636-3400· 113 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Dec 11, 1972 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Aug 25, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent Jun 20, 2023

Fines, last 3 years

3.20

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 20, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Aug 30, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 60 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Aug 25, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. F-0921
Aug 25, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
Aug 25, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 60 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Aug 25, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Aug 25, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Aug 25, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 25, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide bedrooms with required basics: a window to the outside, a room at or above ground level, adequate bedding, furniture that fits the resident's needs, or enough closet space. · F-0917
Aug 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925
Jun 20, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jun 20, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jun 20, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838
Jun 20, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883
Jun 20, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925
Jan 17, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure resident assessments were done by a qualified health professional. Assessments guide all of a resident's care, so the person doing them must be properly trained. · F-0642
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919
Jan 17, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Jan 17, 2019	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (23 → 14).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2019

2023

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	23	0	E
2023	23	1	G ▲
2025	14	0	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.20

3.83

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.94

0.83

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.98

3.43

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.20	3.83	3.95	bottom 20% in Maryland; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.94	0.83	0.69	top 23% in Maryland; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.98	3.43	3.50	bottom 33% in Maryland; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.81	0.63	0.48	top 19% in Maryland; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	36.8	40.2	45.8	top 40% in Maryland; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	37.5	38.7	42.9	top 47% in Maryland; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.28, RN 0.96, weekend 3.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.28 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hammonds Lane Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Individual

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	04/01/2011
Gen Operations I LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	04/01/2011
Gen Operations II LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	04/01/2011
Genesis Healthcare INC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	04/01/2011
Genesis Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/02/2015
Genesis MD Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	04/01/2011
Genesis Operations LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	04/01/2011
GHC Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	04/01/2011
Sun Healthcare Group INC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/02/2015
Whitman, Arnold	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	12/31/2011
Berg, Michael	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2012
Bridgeford, Laura	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Cousins, Karen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2024
Cousins, Karen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/03/2025
Johnson, Nicholas	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2024
Johnson, Nicholas	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/03/2025
Mendelson, Avi	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024

All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Genesis Healthcare — 184 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Larkin Chase Center — Bowie, MD · overall 5/5
Waldorf Center — Waldorf, MD · overall 4/5
Cedar Ridge Center — Skowhegan, ME · overall 3/5
Harbor Hill Center — Belfast, ME · overall 3/5
Marshwood Center — Lewiston, ME · overall 3/5
Oak Grove Center — Waterville, ME · overall 1/5SFF
Orono Commons — Orono, ME · overall 2/5
Pine Point Center — Scarborough, ME · overall 2/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 183 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Maryland midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 92 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Glen Burnie	3.3 mi	Glen Burnie, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation & Nursing Center	4.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Roland Park Place	4.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Marley Neck Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	4.7 mi	Glen Burnie, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Carroll Park Healthcare	4.9 mi	Baltimore, MD		—/5	abuseSFF
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Baltimore Washington	5.1 mi	Glen Burnie, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Fayette Health and Rehabilitation Center	5.3 mi	Baltimore, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Future Care Canton Harbor	5.4 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Transitional Care Services at Mercy Medical Center	5.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Charlestown Community INC	5.6 mi	Catonsville, MD	★★★★★	4/5
Little Sisters of the Poor	5.7 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Future Care Irvington	5.9 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Anne Arundel, MD — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

South River Rehabilitation and Wellness Center — Edgewater, MD · overall 4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Crofton — Crofton, MD · overall 4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Spa Creek — Annapolis, MD · overall 3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Waugh Chapel — Gambrills, MD · overall 5/5
Complete Care at Annapolis — Annapolis, MD · overall 5/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Brooklyn Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215088.