How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare
1100 Clematis Ave, Pleasantville, NJ 08232 (opens Google Maps) · Atlantic County · (609) 646-2450· 214 certified beds · avg 182 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 31, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.22
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
View all 26 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.22
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.58
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.88
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.22 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 18% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 48% in New Jersey; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.88 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 15% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 41% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 33% in New Jersey; top 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 15% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.61, weekend 3.07.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.43 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehm, Caroline | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Pleasantville Ventures LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/01/2015 |
| Babroff, Sherri | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2015 |
| Babroff, Sherri | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2015 |
| Babroff, Sherri | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2015 |
| Boehm, Caroline | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Delaney, Diane | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Delaney, Diane | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Delaney, Diane | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Flancia, Maria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2022 |
| Flancia, Maria | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2022 |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2020 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Pleasantville Ventures LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Center Management Group — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Cherry Hill, NJ · overall 3/5
- Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care — Brookhaven, NY · overall 2/5
- Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care — New Rochelle, NY · overall 3/5
- Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care — Smithtown, NY · overall 2/5
- Westhampton Care Center — Westhampton, NY · overall 5/5
- Immaculatemarycenter for Rehabilitation&healthcare — Philadelphia, PA · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "How often does the attending doctor physically see each resident, and how is that documented?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 34% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 24 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 13 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meadowview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.8 mi | Northfield, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Excel Care at Egg Harbor | 2.2 mi | Egg Harbor Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Linwood, LLC | 3.7 mi | Linwood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Absecon | 4.6 mi | Absecon, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Excel Care at the Pines | 6.2 mi | Atlantic City, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens | 6.6 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Health Center at Galloway, the | 6.7 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation | 6.7 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| United Methodist Communities at the Shores | 8.6 mi | Ocean City, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oceanview | 15.8 mi | Ocean View, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 15.8 mi | Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 19.3 mi | Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Atlantic, NJ — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Hammonton, NJ · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315054.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).