66 West Jimmie Leeds Road, Galloway Township, NJ 08205 (opens Google Maps) · Atlantic County · (609) 748-9100· 120 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Nov 2, 2023 · F-0658 · triggered by a complaint
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 5, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Nov 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 11 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $76,958.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2023 | Fine | $76,958 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.67 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 50% in New Jersey; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 34% in New Jersey; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.39 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 46% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 24% in New Jersey; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 58.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 14% in New Jersey; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 0.45, weekend 3.27.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.54 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Health Center at Galloway, the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruckstein, Daniel | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Bruckstein, Daniel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Bruckstein, Robert | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Bruckstein, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Bruckstein, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Continuum Healthcare I INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Continuum Healthcare I INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2025 |
| Dasondi, Vivekkumar | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Dasondi, Vivekkumar | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Dorn, Cheryl | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Execucare Associates | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2025 |
| Execucare Associates | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2025 |
| Galloway Real Property LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Galloway Real Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Leshkowitz & Company LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Leshkowitz & Company LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2025 |
| Litman, Warren | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Litman, Warren | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Mandelbaum, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2019 |
| Shaffer, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2024 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Continuum Healthcare — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation | 0.2 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens | 0.4 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Absecon | 3.3 mi | Absecon, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Excel Care at Egg Harbor | 4.5 mi | Egg Harbor Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.6 mi | Northfield, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 6.7 mi | Pleasantville, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Linwood, LLC | 9.5 mi | Linwood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Excel Care at the Pines | 10.1 mi | Atlantic City, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 11.2 mi | Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 14.4 mi | Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| United Methodist Communities at the Shores | 14.8 mi | Ocean City, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 17.9 mi | Hammonton, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315210.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details