How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
New Jersey ›Little Egg Harbor TW
151 Ninth Avenue, Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ 08087 (opens Google Maps) · Ocean County · (609) 294-3200· 130 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Sep 2, 1999 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.17 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 24% in New Jersey; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 50% in New Jersey; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.81 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 25% in New Jersey; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.5 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 37% in New Jersey; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 16.7 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 10% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.53, weekend 3.62.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.98 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper NJ Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| Gold NJ Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| Malt Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| Meisner, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| Mystic Meadows Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/01/2023 |
| NJ Mazel Parentco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| NJ Noble Parentco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| SGS 2010 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| Silver NJ Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| Tyh 2017 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2023 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Dasondi, Vivekkumar | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Eicke, Mary Jane | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atlas Healthcare — 29 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 28 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 3.4 mi | Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Manahawkin Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.2 mi | Manahawkin, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Southern Ocean Center | 7.2 mi | Manahawkin, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Barnegat Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 11.0 mi | Barnegat, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens | 14.2 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Health Center at Galloway, the | 14.4 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation | 14.5 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Absecon | 14.7 mi | Absecon, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Excel Care at Egg Harbor | 17.4 mi | Egg Harbor Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Excel Care at the Pines | 17.7 mi | Atlantic City, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 19.3 mi | Pleasantville, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 19.7 mi | Northfield, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ocean, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315456.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details