Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Name: Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Address: 1001 CENTER ST, Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ, 08087, US
Telephone: 6092969292

1001 Center St, Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ 08087 · Ocean County · 171 certified beds · avg 150 residents/day · certified since Jan 16, 1986

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$11,175

Fines, last 3 years

3.36

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Dec 19, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 25, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 6, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Dec 6, 2022	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 10).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	8	0	E
2024	8	0	F
2025	13	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $11,175.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Nov 25, 2025	Fine	$11,175

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	New Jersey avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.36	3.88	3.95	bottom 28% in New Jersey; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.54	0.67	0.69	bottom 47% in New Jersey; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.12	3.53	3.50	bottom 36% in New Jersey; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.41	0.50	0.48	top 47% in New Jersey; top 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	43.1	39.7	45.8	bottom 38% in New Jersey; top 45% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	33.3	37.7	42.9	top 42% in New Jersey; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.55, weekend 3.15. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Harman, Dina	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Harman, Dina	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Marquis Limited LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2022
Marquis Limited LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/07/2025
Neuman, Refoel	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Neuman, Refoel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
NFR 2020 Irrv Tr	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Nutraco LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Nutraco LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/07/2025
Posen, Mindee	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Posen, Mindee	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Quinto Nexgen LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Rao, Anupama	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Rao, Anupama	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Reliant Pro Rehab LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Reliant Pro Rehab LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/07/2025
Rsbrmk Holdings LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Seacrest Property SNF LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
SK Nexgen Tr	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2021
Sullivan, Lawrence	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	10/07/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
"What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	3.4 mi	Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
Manahawkin Health and Rehabilitation Center	10.6 mi	Manahawkin, NJ	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Southern Ocean Center	10.6 mi	Manahawkin, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens	10.9 mi	Galloway Township, NJ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Health Center at Galloway, the	11.2 mi	Galloway Township, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation	11.3 mi	Galloway Township, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
Preferred Care at Absecon	11.3 mi	Absecon, NJ	★★★★★	4/5
Excel Care at Egg Harbor	14.0 mi	Egg Harbor Township, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Barnegat Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	14.4 mi	Barnegat, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Excel Care at the Pines	14.6 mi	Atlantic City, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare	15.8 mi	Pleasantville, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Meadowview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	16.3 mi	Northfield, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Little Egg Harbor TW →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315218.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

1001 Center St, Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ 08087 · 6092969292

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $11,175

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Nov 25, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
☐ "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 315218 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)