Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens

Name: Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens
Address: 22 WEST JIMMIE LEEDS ROAD, Galloway Township, NJ, 08205, US
Telephone: 6094044848

22 West Jimmie Leeds Road, Galloway Township, NJ 08205 · Atlantic County · 151 certified beds · avg 140 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1995

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.69

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 12, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Jul 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jul 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Jul 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location.
Jul 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jul 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jul 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 8, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Oct 4, 2021	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 4, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 4, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Oct 4, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 4, 2021	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 12).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2021	5	F
2024	12	E
2025	12	F
2026	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	New Jersey avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.69	3.88	3.95	top 47% in New Jersey; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.33	0.67	0.69	bottom 10% in New Jersey; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.47	3.53	3.50	top 40% in New Jersey; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.11	0.50	0.48	bottom 1% in New Jersey; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	52.9	39.7	45.8	bottom 17% in New Jersey; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	47.4	37.7	42.9	bottom 27% in New Jersey; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 0.37, weekend 3.87. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Hebrew Old Age Center of Atlantic City	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	NO DATE PROVIDED
Klein, Janice	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2001
Klein, Janice	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2001
Price, Alysia	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Ricciardi, Louis	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	10/31/2000
Ricciardi, Louis	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/31/2000

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
"Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
"Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
"Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
"Does your admission agreement include an arbitration clause, and is signing it optional?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Health Center at Galloway, the	0.4 mi	Galloway Township, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation	0.5 mi	Galloway Township, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
Preferred Care at Absecon	3.0 mi	Absecon, NJ	★★★★★	4/5
Excel Care at Egg Harbor	4.4 mi	Egg Harbor Township, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare	6.6 mi	Pleasantville, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Meadowview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	6.6 mi	Northfield, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Complete Care at Linwood, LLC	9.5 mi	Linwood, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Excel Care at the Pines	9.8 mi	Atlantic City, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	10.9 mi	Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	14.2 mi	Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
United Methodist Communities at the Shores	14.8 mi	Ocean City, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare	18.2 mi	Hammonton, NJ	★☆☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Galloway Township →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315340.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens

22 West Jimmie Leeds Road, Galloway Township, NJ 08205 · 6094044848

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
☐ "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
☐ "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
☐ "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
☐ "Does your admission agreement include an arbitration clause, and is signing it optional?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 315340 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)